Home
JournalsCollections
For Authors For Reviewers For Editorial Board Members
Article Processing Charges Open Access
Ethics Advertising Policy
Editorial Policy Resource Center
Company Information Contact Us
OPEN ACCESS

Vitamin D-related Nutrigenetics and Cognitive Decline in an Elderly Population

  • Charlotte Martin1,
  • Zoe Yates2,
  • Martin Veysey3,4,
  • Katrina King4,
  • Suzanne Niblett4 and
  • Mark Lucock1,*
Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine   2017;2(4):131-138

doi: 10.14218/ERHM.2017.00006

Received:

Revised:

Accepted:

Published online:

 Author information

Citation: Martin C, Yates Z, Veysey M, King K, Niblett S, Lucock M. Vitamin D-related Nutrigenetics and Cognitive Decline in an Elderly Population. Explor Res Hypothesis Med. 2017;2(4):131-138. doi: 10.14218/ERHM.2017.00006.

Abstract

Background and objective

Vitamin D has been linked to brain function. To date, there have been limited studies investigating vitamin D receptor (VDR) genetic polymorphisms and cognition. The objective of this study was, therefore, to examine whether any relationships exist between VDR polymorphisms and cognitive decline in an elderly population.

Methods

Six hundred and fifty participants aged ≥ 65 years were recruited from the Central Coast, New South Wales, Australia, and were genotyped for 8 VDR polymorphisms (VDR-ApaI, VDR-BsmI, VDR-TaqI, VDR-FokI, VDR-Tru91, VDR-Cdx2, VDR-A1012G, and VDR-NIaIII). Gene variants were identified using polymerase chain reaction, followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and gel electrophoresis. Cognitive decline was measured using the mini-mental state examination (MMSE), while a self-administered food frequency questionnaire was used to estimate participants’ dietary intake of vitamin D.

Results

Odds ratio (OR) analysis found that VDR-BsmI and VDR-TaqI polymorphic alleles were both associated with increased risk of cognitive decline (OR = 1.55 and OR = 1.49, respectively). VDR-TaqI was also found to be significantly associated with MMSE score, following adjustment for age and sex (p = 0.0005). Examination of the distribution of VDR-TaqI genotypes showed that a greater proportion of participants with the homozygous recessive tt genotype had some degree of cognitive decline (24%). As might be predicted, a significant association was also observed between age and MMSE score (p = 0.015). When examined by sex, a significant relationship was found between age and MMSE for females (p ≤ 0.0001) but no relationship was observed in males. Dietary intake of vitamin D did not influence MMSE outcomes in this cohort.

Conclusions

The VDR-BsmI and VDR-TaqI genetic polymorphisms are associated with cognitive decline in an elderly population.

Keywords

Vitamin D, Cognition, Aging

Introduction

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily and participates in a number of diverse biological actions, due to its distribution in almost all organs and tissues. This expression pattern includes the brain, where VDR expression has been detected in the hypothalamus, hippocampus, cortex and sub-cortical regions,1,2 which are essential for cognition. The active form of vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D3, plays an important role in neuronal differentiation and maturation by controlling the synthesis of neurotrophic agents,1,3 and also by regulating the expression of numerous genes involved in neurotransmitter synthesis, predominantly in the hippocampus (Fig. 1).4,5

Interaction of calcitriol in the target cell in regulating metabolic processes such as brain health.
Fig. 1  Interaction of calcitriol in the target cell in regulating metabolic processes such as brain health.

The VDR is well known for modulating the transcription of genes encoding proteins that execute the “classic” genomic functions of vitamin D for skeletal and mineral homeostasis. However, it also regulates the expression of several genes that mediate “non-classical” actions in non-calcemic tissues. Many of these “non-classical” actions are associated with decreased risk for disorders associated with ageing, including those linked to the nervous system.6,7 The elderly are particularly at risk for a number of degenerative disorders related to low serum calcidiol (25(OH)D3) levels. This is due to a decrease in ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure as a consequence of changes in lifestyle, particularly a decline in outdoor activity.8

Diet can also become less varied with age, resulting in low intake of vitamin D content.9 Most significant, however, is a decrease in the ability to synthesise cutaneous vitamin D after UVR exposure–a result of atrophic changes in the skin and a reduced level of the vitamin D precursor, 7-dehydrocholesterol.10 Investigation of the impact of vitamin D deficiency on the ageing brain is critical, with evidence linking low vitamin D status with poorer outcomes on one or more cognitive function tests,11,12 or a higher frequency of dementia,13 mood disorders,14 cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease (AD).15–17

The VDR gene is located on chromosome 12 (12q13.11) and contains several known polymorphisms. VDR-ApaI (G>T substitution) and VDR-BsmI (A>G substitution) are restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) located at the intron between exon 8–9, and are considered to be silent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as they do not change the amino acid sequence of the encoded VDR protein.15,16 They may, however, alter gene expression through regulation of messenger RNA.16,17 VDR-TaqI (T>C substitution) is a RFLP in exon 9, while the VDR-FokI polymorphism (T>C substitution) is situated at the start of the codon in exon 2 of the VDR gene.18 The VDR-Tru91 (G>A substitution) located within the intron 8 region has been studied to a lesser extent.16,19 Other polymorphisms in the 1A promoter region, including VDR-Cdx2, VDR-A1012G and VDR-G1520C, have also recently been reported.20

The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between eight vitamin D-related genetic polymorphisms and cognitive decline in an elderly cohort. Furthermore, dietary intake of vitamin D and other related markers were analysed to determine their influence on cognition.

Methods

Study design

A total of 650 participants (287 males and 363 females, aged 65–95 years) living independently in either a retirement village or within the community on the Central Coast, New South Wales were assessed for the prevalence of eight VDR genetic polymorphisms, dietary intake of vitamin D, and cognitive ability using the mini-mental state examination (MMSE). Following screening, all dementia participants were excluded from the study.

Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to study participation. This cross-sectional study was approved by the University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee (H-2008-0431), and the Occupational Health and Safety Committee (28.2009). The study was fully compliant with the Helsinki Declaration. The data used in the present study formed part of a larger Retirement Health and Lifestyle Study (RHLS) funded by an Australian Research Council Linkage Project Grant.

DNA analysis

VDR gene variants were examined using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify blood DNA, followed by RFLP analysis and gel electrophoresis. Initially, a QIAamp DNA blood mini-kit was used to extract DNA from whole blood using the QIAamp blood and body fluid spin protocol.21 The optimal PCR reaction mixture and temperature varied for each polymorphism examined. Table 1 provides the thermal cycling conditions for each VDR polymorphism, whilst Table 219,22–26 gives the primer sequence details for VDR-ApaI, VDR-BsmI, VDR-TaqI, VDR-FokI, VDR-Tru91, VDR-Cdx2, VDR-A1012G and VDR-NIaIII. RFLP was performed following PCR amplification, as described in Table 3. VDR-Cdx2 requires a nested primer allele-specific strategy for genotype scoring, eliminating the need for enzyme digestion. Examples of each genotype for each VDR polymorphism can be seen in Figure 2.

Table 1

Summary of the PCR reagents and thermal cycling conditions for each VDR polymorphism

Gene variantGoTaq® Green Master Mix, µLPrimer in 5 pmol, µLDNA, µLH2O, µLThermal cycling conditions
VDR-A1012G1042495°C x 2 min; 35 x [95°C x 30 sec; 58°C x 30 sec; 72°C x 30 sec]; 72°C x 7 min; hold at 15°C
VDR-TaqI, VDR-ApaI, VDR-BsmI, VDR-FokI, VDR-Tru91***1042495°C x 3 min; 35 x [95°C x 30 sec; 61°C x 30 sec; 72°C x 30 sec]; 72°C x 7 min; hold at 15°C
VDR-Cdx2 G*
VDR-Cdx2 A*
10
10
2.4
1.6
2
2
4
4
95°C x 3 min; 35 x [95°C x 30 sec; 56°C x 45 sec; 72°C x 30 sec]; 72°C x 7 min; hold at 15°C
VDR-NIaIII1042495°C x 2 min; 35 x [95°C x 30 sec; 58°C x 30 sec; 72°C x 30 sec]; 72°C x 7 min; hold at 15°C
Table 2

Primer sequences for each VDR polymorphism

Gene variantForward primer, 5′→3′Reverse primer, 5′→3′Fragment length, bpRef
VDR-A1012GCCT CCT CTG TAA GAG GCG AAT AGC GATGGA CAG GTG AAA AAG ATG GGG TTC177[22]
VDR-TaqI, VDR-ApaI***ACG TCT GCA GTG TGT TGG ACTCA CCG GTC AGC AGT CAT AG211[23]
VDR-BsmICAG TTC ACG CAA GAG CAG AGACC TGA AGG GAG ACG TAG CA236[24]
VDR-Cdx2 G*
VDR-Cdx2 A*
AGG ATA GAG AAAA TAA TAG AAA ACA TT
TCC TGA GTA AAC TAG GTC ACA A
AAC CCA TAA TAA GAA ATA AGT TTT TAC
ACG TTA AGT TCA GAA AGA TTA ATT C
297[22]
VDR-FokITGC AGC CTT CAC AGG TCA TAGGC CTG CTT GCT GTT CTT AC157[25]
VDR-NIaIIITGC AGA GAA TGT CCC AAG GTGTC CTG CCA GTC TGA TGG AT236[26]
VDR-Tru91GCA GGG TAC AAA ACT TTG GAGCCT CAT CAC CGA CAT CAT GTC177[19]
Table 3

Summary of the restriction enzyme digestion reactions and electrophoresis conditions for each VDR polymorphism

Gene variantRestriction endonucleasePCR product, µLDigestion bufferOtherIncubation length & temperatureGel conditions - Agarose %Fragment of gel, bp
VDR-A1012G20U EcoRV510x Buffer 4 (1 µL)3.8 µL H2O6 hr @ 37°C3AA: 150, 27
AG: 177, 150, 27
GG: 177
VDR-TaqI20U TaqI510x Buffer 4 (1 µL)1 µL BSA
2.8 µL H2O
3 hr 20 min @ 65°C3TT: 211
Tt: 211, 172, 39
tt: 172, 39
VDR-ApaI50U ApaI510x Buffer 4 (1 µL)1 µL BSA
2.9 µL H2O
3 hr @ 25°C3AA: 211
Aa: 211, 121, 90
aa: 121, 90
VDR-BsmI10U BsmI510x Buffer 4 (1 µL)3.5 µL H2O3 hr 20 min @ 65°C3BB: 236
Bb: 236, 197, 39
bb: 197, 39
VDR-Cdx2 G*
VDR-Cdx2 A*
Not applicable3GG: 297, 110
AG: 297, 235, 110
AA: 297, 235
VDR-FokI4U FokI510x Buffer 4 (1 µL)3 µL H2O3.5 hr @ 37°C3FF: 157
Ff: 157, 121, 36
ff: 121, 36
VDR-NIaIII10U NIaIII510x Buffer 4 (1 µL)2.5 µL H2O6 hr @ 37°C3GG: 236
GC: 236, 197, 39
CC: 197, 39
VDR-Tru914U MseI510x Buffer 4 (1 µL)3 µL H2O3.5 hr @ 37°C3UU: 177
Uu: 177, 91, 86
uu: 91, 86
Examples of each genotype (wild type, heterozygote, homozygous recessive) for the VDR polymorphisms examined in this study.
Fig. 2  Examples of each genotype (wild type, heterozygote, homozygous recessive) for the VDR polymorphisms examined in this study.

A: VDR-ApaI; B: VDR-BsmI; C: VDR-A1012G; D: VDR-FokI; E: VDR-TaqI; F: VDR-Tru91; G: VDR-Cdx2. See Table 3 for further information on banding patterns.

MMSE

The MMSE is a screening tool used to assess dementia, and focuses solely on the cognitive characteristics of mental functions, excluding questions involving mood, abnormal mental experiences and the form of thinking.27 The MMSE is comprised of 11 questions, covering: orientation to time; orientation to place; registration of three words; language; and visual construction. A score of more than 25 (out of 30) is classified as normal, whilst a score of 25 or less is indicative of some degree of cognitive decline.28

Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)

Participants completed a self-administered FFQ, enabling an estimation of daily vitamin D intake. The FFQ was comprised of 38 questions relating to diet, covering 205 food items and all food groups. Participants also provided a full list of supplements they were taking, enabling an estimation of total dietary intake of vitamin D. Each FFQ was analysed in FoodWorks™ (version 6.0.2562) nutritional analysis software program (Xyris Software, Brisbane, QLD, Australia), providing a breakdown of vitamin D intake measured as an average per day. This software package is comprised of a number of different food databases, covering the majority of foods consumed by Australians. These include: Abbott products, Ausfoods (brand food) 2007, and Aus Nut (all foods) 2006.

Statistics

Statistical analysis was conducted using Microsoft Excel 2010 and JMP for Windows (version 11; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, US). Age quartiles, sex and dietary vitamin D data distributions were examined, with mean, standard deviation (SD), median and interquartile range (IQR) reported as appropriate. Participants were stratified by sex and by cognitive decline based on the cut-off score of the MMSE (≤ 25 = cognitive decline; > 25 = no cognitive decline). Genotype prevalence (%), allele number (frequency) and carriage of polymorphic allele (%) were ascertained and tabulated according to cognitive decline. The degree and significance of an allele as a risk factor for a given biochemical/clinical phenotype was ascertained using an odds ratio (OR) and associated 95% confidence interval (CI).

The cognitive decline phenotype was defined as nominal data, and stepwise regression was used to create the best model, for subsequent nominal logistic regression analysis. Stepwise regression was performed in a mixed direction with significant probability [0.250] for a parameter to be considered as a forward step and entered into the model or considered as a backward step and removed from the model. Mallow’s Cp criterion was used for selecting the model where Cp first approaches p variables. R2 is reported and is the proportion of the variation in the response that can be attributed to terms in the model as opposed to random error. While an initial alpha level of 0.05 was set, Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons were also applied. Data is reported after adjusting for age and sex in analyses where stepwise regression modelling was used.

Results

Descriptive data for all subjects with and without cognitive decline is provided in Table 4, while the distribution of cognitive decline by age quartiles for each sex is given in Table 5. Seventy-three participants (11%) were found to exhibit some degree of cognitive decline based on their MMSE score. When examined by age quartiles, the proportion of participants with cognitive decline was highest in males in the 65–72 year-old group (15.2%) and the 73–80 year-old group (11.3%), and highest in females in the 81–88 year-old group (15.9%) and 89–95 year-old groups (28.6%) (Table 5). Total vitamin D intake (diet + supplements) was similar for participants with or without cognitive decline.

Table 4

Descriptive data for all subjects and for those participants with and without cognitive decline, based on MMSE (≤25 = cognitive decline; >25 = no cognitive decline)

All subjectsCognitive declineNo cognitive decline
Number of participants65073 (11%)575 (89%)
Sex
  Male28733 (12%)253 (88%)
  Female36340 (11%)322 (89%)
Age, x ± SD; median (IQR)77. 8 ± 7.0;
78 (72–83);
79.6 ± 7.6;
80 (74–86);
77.5 ± 6.9;
78 (72–83);
Total dietary vitamin D in µg/d,
x ± SD; median (IQR)
7.76 ± 11.54;
2.65 (1.77–7.93)
8.41 ± 10.78;
2.87 (1.9–12.24)
7.65 ± 11.61;
2.65 (1.75–7.41)
Table 5

Distribution of cognitive decline by age quartiles for each sex, based on MMSE (≤25 = cognitive decline; >25 = no cognitive decline) with percentage of participants with and without cognitive decline for each age quartile

65–72 yr73–80 yr81–88 yr89–95 yr
MalesCognitive decline
No cognitive decline
12 (15%)
67 (85%)
12 (11%)
94 (89%)
8 (9%)
77 (91%)
1 (6%)
15 (94%)
FemalesCognitive decline
No cognitive decline
3 (3%)
85 (97%)
12 (9%)
127 (91%)
17 (16%)
90 (84%)
8 (29%)
20 (71%)

Table 6 presents the genetic distribution of each vitamin D-related polymorphism for the cognitive decline phenotype, and gives the genotype prevalence (%), allele number (frequency) and carriage of polymorphic allele (%). An OR and associated 95% CI were calculated to assess the degree of significance of risk for each of the vitamin D-related gene polymorphisms in relation to cognitive decline. Table 6 also shows that the VDR-BsmI and VDR-TaqI polymorphic alleles were both associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline (OR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.08–2.22 and OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.04–2.14, respectively).

Table 6

Occurrence of cognitive decline phenotype, based on MMSE (≤25 = cognitive decline; >25 = no cognitive decline), for genotype prevalence, allele number and carriage of polymorphic allele for vitamin D-related genetic polymorphisms

PolymorphismPhenotypeGenotype prevalence (%)a
Allele number (frequency)
Carriage of polymorphic, allele %Odds ratioCI (Yates corrected p value)
WildtypeHeterozygousRecessiveWildtypePolymorphic
VDR-A1012GCognitive decline
No cognitive decline
22 (31)
185 (33)
40 (56)
272 (48)
10 (13)
108 (19)
84 (0.58)
642 (0.57)
60 (0.42)
488 (0.43)
69
67
VDR-ApaICognitive decline
No cognitive decline
14 (19)
120 (21)
30 (41)
298 (53)
29 (40)
148 (26)
58 (0.40)
538 (0.48)
88 (0.60)
594 (0.52)
81
79
VDR-BsmICognitive decline
No cognitive decline
22 (31)
207 (37)
29 (40)
277 (49)
21 (29)
79 (14)
73 (0.51)
691 (0.61)
71 (0.49)
435 (0.39)
69
63
1.551.075–2.220 (0.0180)
VDR-Cdx2Cognitive decline
No cognitive decline
12 (50)
87 (50)
11 (46)
71 (41)
1 (4)
15 (9)
35 (0.73)
245 (0.71)
13 (0.27)
101 (0.29)
50
50
VDR-FokICognitive decline
No cognitive decline
3 (12)
29 (17)
10 (40)
85 (49)
12 (48)
61 (34)
16 (0.32)
143 (0.41)
34 (0.68)
207 (0.59)
88
83
VDR-NlaIIICognitive decline
No cognitive decline
10 (40)
56 (32)
13 (52)
87 (50)
2 (8)
32 (18)
33 (0.66)
199 (0.57)
17 (0.34)
151 (0.43)
60
68
VDR-TaqICognitive decline
No cognitive decline
25 (34)
203 (37)
27 (37)
280 (51)
21 (29)
66 (12)
77 (0.53)
686 (0.62)
69 (0.47)
412 (0.38)
66
63
1.491.039–2.142 (0.0290)
VDR-Tru91Cognitive decline
No cognitive decline
59 (81)
414 (73)
13 (18)
138 (24)
1 (1)
16 (3)
131 (0.90)
966 (0.85)
15 (0.10)
170 (0.15)
19
27

Multivariate analyses of all vitamin D-related genetic polymorphisms using stepwise regression showed a significant relationship between VDR-TaqI and MMSE (p = 0.0014; R2 = 0.0292). When adjusted for age and sex, the relationship between VDR-TaqI and MMSE remained significant (p = 0.0004; R2 = 0.0473). Both results upheld their significance following a Bonferroni correction. To further examine the significant relationship between VDR-TaqI and MMSE, the percentage of participants with cognitive decline for each genotype was calculated. Figure 3 shows that the highest percentage of participants with some degree of cognitive decline was amongst those with the homozygous recessive tt genotype (24%).

Percentage of participants with each VDR-<italic>Taq</italic>I gene variant (wild type TT, heterozygote Tt, homozygous recessive tt) and cognitive decline, based on an MMSE score of ≤ 25.
Fig. 3  Percentage of participants with each VDR-TaqI gene variant (wild type TT, heterozygote Tt, homozygous recessive tt) and cognitive decline, based on an MMSE score of ≤ 25.

Nominal logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between other variables and MMSE score, independent of genetic influence. Results showed a significant inverse association between age and MMSE score (p = 0.0145; R2 = 0.0131; slope estimate = −0.0180), and when examined by sex, a significant relationship was shown between age and MMSE for females (p ≤ 0.0001; R2 = 0.0865; slope estimate = −0.1160) but not males.

Discussion

The present study examined the relationship between VDR polymorphisms and cognition in 650 elderly participants using the MMSE to assess their degree of cognitive decline. An OR analysis showed that both the VDR-BsmI and VDR-TaqI polymorphic alleles increased the risk of cognitive decline and that the VDR-TaqI genetic polymorphism was also significantly associated with MMSE score. The percentage of participants with some degree of cognitive decline was highest amongst those with the VDR-TaqI homozygous recessive tt genotype (24%).

Vitamin D is important for brain and other physiological functions, and plays an important role in the biosynthesis of neurotransmitters,4 neuroprotection,5 immunomodulation and detoxification.4 Consequently, some of these biological effects suggest that vitamin D may influence cognitive function and mood disorders. Evidence surrounding vitamin D and the human brain have revealed individuals are increasingly vulnerable to mood disorders during the winter months,29,30 and a vitamin D deficiency may contribute to seasonal affective disorder. Additionally, evidence has shown a link between low vitamin D status and mood disorders, accompanied with poor cognitive function.31 Balion et al.32 conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between vitamin D, cognitive function and MMSE score; overall, it was found that lower vitamin D concentrations were associated with poorer cognitive scores and higher AD risk. In the present study, no associations were found between dietary vitamin D intake and MMSE score.

Research surrounding VDR polymorphisms and cognition have mostly focused on AD,33,34 and to a lesser extent cognitive decline.35 In one study, a meta-analysis found associations between VDR polymorphisms and AD and Parkinson’s disease (PD) susceptibility.36 Other findings include a significant association between the VDR-TaqI “T” allele and AD susceptibility (OR = 0.735, 95% CI: 0.596–0.907),36 while in a further study the VDR-ApaI A allele and AA genotype increased the risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (OR = 1.62, 95%CI: 1.13–2.31 and OR = 3.49, 95% CI: 1.570–7.740, respectively).24 The results also showed that the variant B allele of VDR-BsmI increased the risk of MCI (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.240–3.050).37

Najmi Varzaneh et al.38 found the VDR-FokI was significantly associated with cognitive function following assessment using the MMSE. Examination of cognitive function amongst FokI genotypes showed “FF” participants had a higher cognitive score compared with “ff” participants.38 Similar findings were shown for FokI in a recent longitudinal study by Gatto et al.39 This study examined VDR polymorphisms with PD using the MMSE, and found that for each additional copy of the FokI-A allele (also referred to as the “f” allele) an associated decrease in the total MMSE score occurred. Furthermore, their results indicated that participants with the AA genotype (also referred to as “ff” genotype) had a faster decline in cognitive function than participants with other VDR-FokI genotypes. No significant association was found between any other VDR polymorphism and PD in this study based on a level of significance of p < 0.05.39

Another study involving elderly subjects found significant associations between VDR-BsmI, VDR-TaqI and a low composite cognitive score (calculated by averaging the scores of other cognitive function tests) but not with a low MMSE score.40 Additionally, a significant association was observed between VDR-ApaI and less depressive symptoms based on the Geriatric Depression Scale.40

Since vitamin D was the nutrient of particular interest, blood 25(OH)D3 measurements would have provided further details surrounding the vitamin D status of participants. This is therefore a limitation in the present study.

Future research directions

Further research is necessary to either confirm or refute the presently observed associations of VDR gene variants with cognitive decline as measured using the MMSE scale. By obtaining a more thorough understanding of VDR variants and their influence on risk of cognitive decline, new insights into the underlying pathophysiology of cognitive decline and development of possible intervention and treatment strategies will emerge. These may include the screening of particular VDR polymorphisms as part of a routine health check and the use of supplemental vitamin D at a younger age. Based on the preliminary results of this study, we hypothesize that the use of vitamin D as a potential preventative agent in cognitive decline will reduce the impact this degenerative disorder currently has on our health system.

Conclusions

Our results show that the VDR-BsmI and VDR-TaqI polymorphisms are associated with cognitive decline in an elderly population. Since the elderly are particularly at risk for a number of degenerative disorders related to low serum 25(OH)D3 levels, including cognitive decline, further exploration of the influence of VDR gene variants is necessary to reveal the full extent of potential interactions.

Abbreviations

AD: 

Alzheimer’s disease

CI: 

confidence interval

FFQ: 

food frequency questionnaire

MCI: 

mild cognitive impairment

MMSE: 

mini mental state examination

OR: 

odds ratio

PD: 

Parkinson’s disease

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

RFLP: 

restriction fragment length polymorphism

RHLS: 

Retirement Health and Lifestyle Study

SNP: 

single nucleotide polymorphism

UVR: 

ultraviolet radiation

VDR: 

vitamin D receptor

Declarations

Acknowledgement

Part of the research on which this paper is based was conducted as part of the Retirement Health and Lifestyle Study, The University of Newcastle. We are grateful to the Australian Research Council, Central Coast Local Health District Public Health Unit, UnitingCare Ageing NSW/ACT, Urbis Pty Ltd, Valhalla Village Pty Ltd, and Hunter Valley Research Foundation for funding the initial study and to the men and women of the Central Coast region who provided the information recorded. The authors would also like to thank the researchers and RHLS clinic staff based at Gosford Teaching Unit, including Jenny Marriott, Marie Mazaroli, Elizabeth Death, Jodi Humphreys, and Louise Lambeth. This research was supported by an Australian Research Council linkage grant (G0188386) awarded to Martin Veysey (lead CI).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests related to this publication.

Authors’ contributions

Study design (CM, ML), performance of experiments (CM), analysis and interpretation of data (CM, ML), manuscript writing (CM, ZY, MV), critical revision of the manuscript (CM, ZY, KK, SN, ML), statistical analysis (CM), providing critical funding (MV).

References

  1. Annweiler C, Schott AM, Berrut G, Chauvire V, Le Gall D, Inzitari M, et al. Vitamin D and ageing: neurological issues. Neuropsychobiology 2010;62(3):139-150 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Buell JS, Dawson-Hughes B. Vitamin D and neurocognitive dysfunction: preventing “D”ecline?. Mol Aspects Med 2008;29(6):415-422 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Brown J, Bianco JI, McGrath JJ, Eyles DW. 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces nerve growth factor, promotes neurite outgrowth and inhibits mitosis in embryonic rat hippocampal neurons. Neurosci Lett 2003;343(2):139-143 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Garcion E, Wion-Barbot N, Montero-Menei CN, Berger F, Wion D. New clues about vitamin D functions in the nervous system. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2002;13(3):100-105 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Kalueff AV, Tuohimaa P. Neurosteroid hormone vitamin D and its utility in clinical nutrition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2007;10(1):12-19 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Holmoy T, Moen SM. Assessing vitamin D in the central nervous system. Acta Neurol Scand 2010;122(Suppl 190):88-92 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Tuohimaa P, Keisala T, Minasyan A, Cachat J, Kalueff A. Vitamin D, nervous system and aging. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2009;34(Suppl 1):S278-S286 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Hossein-Nezhad A, Holick MF. Vitamin d for health: a global perspective. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88(7):720-755 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Hickson M. Malnutrition and ageing. Postgrad Med J 2006;82(963):2-8 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. MacLaughlin J, Holick MF. Aging decreases the capacity of human skin to produce vitamin D3. J Clin Invest 1985;76(4):1536-1538 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Llewellyn DJ, Lang IA, Langa KM, Muniz-Terrera G, Phillips CL, Cherubini A, et al. Vitamin D and risk of cognitive decline in elderly persons. Arch Intern Med 2010;170(13):1135-1141 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Slinin Y, Paudel M, Taylor BC, Ishani A, Rossom R, Yaffe K, et al. Association between serum 25(OH) vitamin D and the risk of cognitive decline in older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012;67(10):1092-1098 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. van der Schaft J, Koek HL, Dijkstra E, Verhaar HJ, van der Schouw YT, Emmelot-Vonk MH. The association between vitamin D and cognition: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 2013;12(4):1013-1023 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Imai CM, Halldorsson TI, Eiriksdottir G, Cotch MF, Steingrimsdottir L, Thorsdottir I, et al. Depression and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in older adults living at northern latitudes - AGES-Reykjavik Study. J Nutr Sci 2015;4:e37 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Uitterlinden AG, Fang Y, Van Meurs JB, Pols HA, Van Leeuwen JP. Genetics and biology of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Gene 2004;338(2):143-156 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Kostner K, Denzer N, Muller CS, Klein R, Tilgen W, Reichrath J. The relevance of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms for cancer: a review of the literature. Anticancer Res 2009;29(9):3511-3536 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Smolders J, Peelen E, Thewissen M, Menheere P, Tervaert JW, Hupperts R, et al. The relevance of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms for vitamin D research in multiple sclerosis. Autoimmun Rev 2009;8(7):621-626 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. Ranganathan P. Genetics of bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis—role of vitamin D receptor polymorphisms. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48(4):342-346 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Gong YL, Xie DW, Deng ZL, Bostick RM, Miao XJ, Zhang JH, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene Tru9I polymorphism and risk for incidental sporadic colorectal adenomas. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11(31):4794-4799 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Diorio C, Sinotte M, Brisson J, Berube S, Pollak M. Vitamin D pathway polymorphisms in relation to mammographic breast density. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(9):2505-2508 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. QIAGEN. QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit and QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit Handbook. 2001. View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12(3):189-198 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  23. Braekhus A, Laake K, Engedal K. A low, ‘normal’ score on the Mini-Mental State Examination predicts development of dementia after three years. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43(6):656-661 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Sunshine, serotonin, and skin: a partial explanation for seasonal patterns in psychopathology?. Innov Clin Neurosci 2013;10(7-8):20-24 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. Magnusson A. An overview of epidemiological studies on seasonal affective disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000;101(3):176-184 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Wilkins CH, Sheline YI, Roe CM, Birge SJ, Morris JC. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with low mood and worse cognitive performance in older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14(12):1032-1040 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Balion C, Griffith LE, Strifler L, Henderson M, Patterson C, Heckman G, et al. Vitamin D, cognition, and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2012;79(13):1397-1405 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. Lehmann DJ, Refsum H, Warden DR, Medway C, Wilcock GK, Smith AD. The vitamin D receptor gene is associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 2011;504(2):79-82 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  29. Gezen-Ak D, Dursun E, Bilgic B, Hanagasi H, Ertan T, Gurvit H, et al. Vitamin d receptor gene haplotype is associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Tohoku J Exp Med 2012;228(3):189-196 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Beydoun MA, Ding EL, Beydoun HA, Tanaka T, Ferrucci L, Zonderman AB. Vitamin D receptor and megalin gene polymorphisms and their associations with longitudinal cognitive change in US adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95(1):163-178 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  31. Lee YH, Kim JH, Song GG. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis. Neurol Sci 2014;35(12):1947-1953 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  32. Keyimu K, Zhou XH, Miao HJ, Zou T. Relationship between vitamin D receptor gene polymorphism and mild cognitive impairment in elderly Uygur people. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7(12):5282-5288 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  33. Najmi Varzaneh F, Sharifi F, Hossein-Nezhad A, Mirarefin M, Maghbooli Z, Ghaderpanahi M, et al. Association of vitamin D receptor with longevity and healthy aging. Acta Med Iran 2013;51(4):236-241 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  34. Gatto NM, Paul KC, Sinsheimer JS, Bronstein JM, Bordelon Y, Rausch R, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Sci 2016;370:100-106 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  35. Kuningas M, Mooijaart SP, Jolles J, Slagboom PE, Westendorp RG, van Heemst D. VDR gene variants associate with cognitive function and depressive symptoms in old age. Neurobiol Aging 2009;30(3):466-473 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  36. Selvaraj P, Alagarasu K, Harishankar M, Vidyarani M, Narayanan PR. Regulatory region polymorphisms of vitamin D receptor gene in pulmonary tuberculosis patients and normal healthy subjects of south India. Int J Immunogenet 2008;35(3):251-254 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  37. Riggs BL, Nguyen TV, Melton LJ, Morrison NA, O’Fallon WM, Kelly PJ, et al. The contribution of vitamin D receptor gene alleles to the determination of bone mineral density in normal and osteoporotic women. J Bone Miner Res 1995;10(6):991-996 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  38. Falleti E, Bitetto D, Fabris C, Cussigh A, Fontanini E, Fornasiere E, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and hepatocellular carcinoma in alcoholic cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16(24):3016-3024 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  39. Harris SS, Eccleshall TR, Gross C, Dawson-Hughes B, Feldman D. The vitamin D receptor start codon polymorphism (FokI) and bone mineral density in premenopausal American black and white women. J Bone Miner Res 1997;12(7):1043-1048 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  40. Halsall JA, Osborne JE, Epstein MP, Pringle JH, Hutchinson PE. The unfavorable effect of the A allele of the vitamin D receptor promoter polymorphism A-1012G has different mechanisms related to susceptibility and outcome of malignant melanoma. Dermatoendocrinol 2009;1(1):54-57 View Article PubMed/NCBI