Home
JournalsCollections
For Authors For Reviewers For Editorial Board Members
Article Processing Charges Open Access
Ethics Advertising Policy
Editorial Policy Resource Center
Company Information Contact Us
OPEN ACCESS

Morphologic Variants of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytomorphology and Diagnostic Pitfalls

  • Dan Lu1,* ,
  • Huihong Xu2 and
  • Guoping Cai3,4
Journal of Clinical and Translational Pathology   2022;2(1):12-17

doi: 10.14218/JCTP.2022.00005

Received:

Revised:

Accepted:

Published online:

 Author information

Citation: Lu D, Xu H, Cai G. Morphologic Variants of Well-Differentiated Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytomorphology and Diagnostic Pitfalls. J Clin Transl Pathol. 2022;2(1):12-17. doi: 10.14218/JCTP.2022.00005.

Abstract

Morphologic variants of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are uncommon. These variants may mimic non-PanNETs, and when under recognized, it would lead to misdiagnosis by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy. The present report describes the unique cytomorphologic features and diagnostic clues of pigmented, pleomorphic, clear cell/lipid-rich and oncocytic variants of well-differentiated PanNETs. The differential diagnoses of each morphologic variant are also discussed. Ancillary immunohistochemical studies with appropriate markers are crucial in the diagnostic work-up. Raising the awareness of PanNET morphologic variants is essential for preventing diagnostic pitfalls, and rendering an accurate diagnosis during the FNA diagnostic work-up of pancreatic lesions.

Keywords

Pancreas, Neuroendocrine tumor, Fine-needle aspiration, Cytomorphology

Introduction

The vast majority of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are well-differentiated, and are sub-classified as functional or non-functional tumors, together accounting for approximately 2% of all pancreatic tumors.1 The preferred preoperative approach for the diagnosis of PanNET is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA).2–6 Well-differentiated PanNETs have unique cytomorphologic features. The classic features include single and dyscohesive clusters of relatively uniform tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm, eccentrically located nuclei (plasmacytoid appearance), and speckled (salt and pepper) chromatin. With the recognition of these cytomorphologic features, the application of confirmatory immunohistochemistry studies with neuroendocrine markers has resulted in accurate cytological diagnoses.

However, a spectrum of morphologic variants of PanNETs, although very uncommon, has been gradually recognized, and some of these variants have distinct biologic and prognostic significance.7–14 More importantly, these variants may not retain the classic cytomorphologic features of PanNETs. Therefore, these may present as substantial diagnostic challenges, especially in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens, when under recognized. Raising the awareness of the characteristic morphology of individual variants is the most effective approach to prevent a potential misdiagnosis. The present review discussed examples of selective PanNET morphologic variants, with focus on the specific cytomorphology and corresponding differential diagnosis.

Pigmented variant

Although the pigmented variant may largely retain the classic cytomorphology of PanNETs, the cells of this variant additionally and characteristically contain abundant brown-to-black granular pigments in the cytoplasm, often obscuring nuclear details (Fig. 1). The pigment is usually also present in the background, which is presumably caused by the dispersal of the pigment from ruptured cells during smearing.15,16

Pigmented variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Fig. 1  Pigmented variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

(a) Cellular aspirate consists of loosely cohesive clusters of cells, and isolated cells or stripped nuclei (Romanowsky stain, 100×). (b and c) The cells present a bland, round-to-oval and eccentric nuclei, a finely granular chromatin, and an inconspicuous nucleoli. Abundant brown-black pigments are present in the cytoplasm and background (b: Romanowsky stain, 400×; c: Papanicolaou stain, 400×). (d) The cells are immunoreactive for chromogranin (Immunoperoxidase stain, 400×).

The presence of brown-black pigment can easily raise the differential diagnosis of malignant melanoma, which is the most common pigmented neoplasm secondarily involving the pancreas. Malignant melanoma demonstrates overlapping cytomorphologic features with PanNETs, which include highly cellular aspirates, isolated-to-loosely cohesive cells, eccentric nuclei presenting with a plasmacytoid appearance, and occasional binucleated cells. The pigments in these two entities are morphologically indistinguishable. However, as observed on electron microscopy, the pigment in PanNETs is neuromelanin or lipofuscin, and not melanin seen in malignant melanoma.9,15 An easily accessible immunohistochemistry study can reliably distinguish these two entities from each other. PanNETs are immunoreactive for cytokeratins and neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin, CD56 and INSM1), but are negative for melanocytic markers (S100, HMB45, Melan A and SOX10). Melanomas exhibit an opposite immunoprofile.

Pleomorphic variant

Occasional atypical cells with enlarged nuclei, known as endocrine atypia, can be observed in classic PanNETs. The pleomorphic variant exhibits striking anisonucleosis, and frequently contains cells with markedly enlarged and hyperchromatic nuclei in the background of other cells, presenting a more classic neuroendocrine tumor cytomorphology (Fig. 2). The chromatin in bizarre nuclei presents a smudgy and degenerative appearance, mimicking that observed in ancient schwannomas and uterine leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei (symplastic leiomyoma). This variant has recently been found to carry less aggressive clinical behaviors, when compared to classic PanNETs.14 However, the extreme nuclear pleomorphism can render this variant prone to be misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma.11 Although the neuroendocrine origin of this variant can be confirmed by immunohistochemistry, care must be given to prevent the misclassification of this variant as a higher-grade tumor, such as neuroendocrine carcinoma. It is noteworthy that the tumor cell proliferative rate evaluated by the mitotic activity or Ki-67 labeling index can be utilized to grade PanNETs, and that the degree of nuclear atypia alone does not predict the prognosis. Neuroendocrine carcinoma demonstrates distinct genetic abnormalities, in addition to the high proliferative rate.17

Pleomorphic variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Fig. 2  Pleomorphic variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

(a) In the background of cells with conventional morphology, scattered bizarre cells are present with striking nuclear pleomorphism and hyperchromasia (Romanowsky stain, 100×). (b) The cells present a bizarre nuclei with irregular nuclear contours and hyperchromasia, but with a smudgy/degenerative chromatin (Papanicolaou stain, 400×).

Clear cell/lipid-rich variant

The terminologies “clear cell” variant and “lipid-rich” variant have been interchangeably used in most literatures to describe the seemingly similar morphologic variant of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).18–20 This variant of PanNETs can be sporadic or syndromic, and some cases have been identified in patients with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL) or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN I).7,8,18,21,22 Neoplastic cells are morphologically characterized by the abundant clear-to-prominently vacuolated and bubbly cytoplasm (Fig. 3), and this is probably due to the cytoplasmic accumulation of lipid droplets.8 These cells usually retain the nuclear features of classic PanNETs on FNA direct smears.20–24

Clear cell/lipid-rich variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Fig. 3  Clear cell/lipid-rich variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

(a) Cellular aspirate consists of loosely cohesive clusters of cells and single cells (Romanowsky stain, 100×). (b) The cytoplasm contains prominent fine vacuoles (Romanowsky stain, 400×). (c) The nuclei are round to oval, with speckled chromatin and small nucleoli (Papanicolaou stain, 400×). (d) The cells are positive for synaptophysin (Immunoperoxidase stain, 400×).

The most important differential diagnosis of this variant is clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), particularly because patients with VHL have an increased risk for development of CCRCC,25 and because CCRCC is the most common metastatic malignancy in the pancreas. This variant should also be distinguished from ectopic adrenal tissues in the pancreas or adrenocortical neoplasm, among others. Due to the significant cytomorphologic overlapping among the three entities, the combination of immunohistochemical stains would be crucial for making the distinctions. Typically, PanNETs are immunoreactive for cytokeratins and neuroendocrine markers. CCRCC is immunoreactive for cytokeratins and renal cell carcinoma markers (PAX8, RCC, CD10, vimentin and CA-IX). Adrenocortical tissues and neoplasms are immunoreactive for inhibin and SF1, but negative for cytokeratins. However, there are a few caveats when interpreting the immunohistochemical results in this regard. PAX8 is frequently expressed in PanNETs, when compared to NETs that originate from other anatomic sites.26,27 Theoretically, the clear cell/lipid-rich variant of PanNETs can express PAX8. In addition, inhibin positivity has been reported in clear cell/lipid-rich PanNETs,22,24 while a significant proportion of adrenocortical tissues or neoplasms is immunoreactive for synaptophysin. Therefore, cytokeratin and a panel of at least two markers of each origin should be included during the diagnostic work-up.

Oncocytic variant

In comparison with classic PanNETs, cells in the oncocytic variant are arranged in more cohesive clusters on cytologic smears, contain abundant granular eosinophilic cytoplasm, and exhibit a greater degree of nuclear atypia, including nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear overlapping and prominent nucleoli, but usually maintain relatively smooth nuclear membrane and finely granular chromatin (Fig. 4). Conspicuous nuclear atypia can lead to the misdiagnosis of this variant as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on cytology specimens.28 This variant should be differentiated from intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm, due to the presence of abundant granular cytoplasm, especially when the PanNET is cystic.29 Another important differential diagnosis is hepatocellular carcinoma, particularly when the tumor presents as a metastasis in the liver.30 However, with the awareness of this variant, followed by judicious immunohistochemical work-up, arriving at a correct diagnosis would not be difficult. This variant is clinically more aggressive, and more frequently presents with a larger tumor size, a higher tumor grade, and a higher tumor stage when diagnosed.14

Oncocytic variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
Fig. 4  Oncocytic variant of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

(a) Cellular aspirate consists of loosely cohesive clusters of cells and single cells (Romanowsky stain, 100×). (b) The cells have abundant granular cytoplasms (Romanowsky stain, 400×). (c) The nuclei are round-to-oval, with speckled chromatin and prominent nucleoli (Papanicolaou stain, 400×). (d) The cells are positive for INSM1 (Immunoperoxidase stain, 400×).

Conclusions

The pigmented, pleomorphic, clear cell and oncocytic variants of PanNETs have unique cytomorphologic features, but may share similar features with other neoplasms that are included in the differential diagnosis, as summarized in Table 1. Clinically, some variants are more aggressive, while other variants are more indolent. Recognizing the cytomorphologic and immunophenotypic features of these variants in FNA specimens is critically important to make a correct diagnosis, preventing diagnostic pitfalls, and guiding the appropriate clinical management.

Table 1

The cytomorphologic features and differential diagnosis of morphologic variants of well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

Cytomorphologic featuresDifferential diagnosisImmunohistochemistry
Pigmented VariantRelatively uniform cells, “salt and pepper” chromatin, black-brown pigmentsMalignant melanomaMalignant melanoma: (+) Melanocytic markers; (−) CKs, NE markers
Pleomorphic VariantBizarre cells with smudgy chromatin, classic NET cells in the backgroundNeuroendocrine carcinomaNeuroendocrine carcinoma: (+) NE markers; Higher Ki-67 index
Ductal adenocarcinomaDuctal adenocarcinoma: (−) NE markers
Clear cell/lipid-rich VariantAbundant clear to vacuolated and bubbly cytoplasm, “salt and pepper” chromatinClear cell renal cell carcinomaClear cell renal cell carcinoma: (+) RCC markers; (−) NE markers, SF1, inhibin
Adrenal cortical neoplasmAdrenal cortical neoplasm: (+) SF1, inhibin; (−) CKs, PAX8, CA-IX, RCC; (+/−) Synaptophysin (other NE markers negative)
Oncocytic VariantClear to vacuolated cytoplasm, larger nuclei, variable nucleoliDuctal adenocarcinomaDuctal adenocarcinoma: (−) NE markers
Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasmIntraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm: (−) NE markers
Hepatocellular carcinomaHepatocellular carcinoma:(+) HCC markers; (−) NE markers

Abbreviations

FNA: 

fine-needle aspiration

PanNET: 

pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor

Declarations

Acknowledgement

This work was virtually presented in part at the 2021 Chinese American Pathologists Association Diagnostic Course.

Funding

No specific funding was received for the study.

Conflict of interest

One of the authors, Dr. Guoping Cai, has been the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Clinical and Translational Pathology since March 2021. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design: DL, HX and GC; Acquisition of data: DL, HX and GC; Analysis and interpretation of data: DL, HX and GC; Drafting of the manuscript: DL; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: HX and GC; Administrative, technical, or material support, and study supervision: DL and GC. All authors made a significant contribution to the study, and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. Franko J, Feng W, Yip L, Genovese E, Moser AJ. Non-functional neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas: incidence, tumor biology, and outcomes in 2,158 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14(3):541-548 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Figueiredo FA, Giovannini M, Monges G, Charfi S, Bories E, Pesenti C, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: a large single-center experience. Pancreas 2009;38(8):936-940 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Bernstein J, Ustun B, Alomari A, Bao F, Aslanian HR, Siddiqui U, et al. Performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in diagnosing pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cytojournal 2013;10:10 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Pitman MB, Centeno BA, Ali SZ, Genevay M, Stelow E, Mino-Kenudson M, et al. Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines. Diagn Cytopathol 2014;42(4):338-350 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Unno J, Kanno A, Masamune A, Kasajima A, Fujishima F, Ishida K, et al. The usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors based on the World Health Organization classification. Scand J Gastroenterol 2014;49(11):1367-1374 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Wang J, Benhammou JN, Ghassemi K, Kim S, Sedarat A, Farrell J, et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Accurately Diagnoses Smaller Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Compared To Computer Tomography-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration. J Gastroenterol Pancreatol Liver Disord 2017;4(2):1-7 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Lubensky IA, Pack S, Ault D, Vortmeyer AO, Libutti SK, Choyke PL, et al. Multiple neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas in von Hippel-Lindau disease patients: histopathological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol 1998;153(1):223-231 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Hoang MP, Hruban RH, Albores-Saavedra J. Clear cell endocrine pancreatic tumor mimicking renal cell carcinoma: a distinctive neoplasm of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Am J Surg Pathol 2001;25(5):602-609 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Smith AE, Levi AW, Nadasdy T, Campbell KA, Fishman EK, Hruban RH. The pigmented “black” neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas: a question of origin. Cancer 2001;92(7):1984-1991 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. Bergmann F, Hackert T, Mechtersheimer G, Penzel R, Bläker H, Berger I, et al. Differential diagnosis of non-epithelial tumors of the pancreas: malignant non-epithelial pancreatic tumor with focal pigmentation. Virchows Arch 2004;444(2):190-193 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Zee SY, Hochwald SN, Conlon KC, Brennan MF, Klimstra DS. Pleomorphic pancreatic endocrine neoplasms: a variant commonly confused with adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29(9):1194-1200 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Singh R, Basturk O, Klimstra DS, Zamboni G, Chetty R, Hussain S, et al. Lipid-rich variant of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30(2):194-200 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  13. Volante M, La Rosa S, Castellano I, Finzi G, Capella C, Bussolati G. Clinico-pathological features of a series of 11 oncocytic endocrine tumours of the pancreas. Virchows Arch 2006;448(5):545-551 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Xue Y, Reid MD, Pehlivanoglu B, Obeng RC, Jiang H, Memis B, et al. Morphologic Variants of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinicopathologic Analysis and Prognostic Stratification. Endocr Pathol 2020;31(3):239-253 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Koljenović S, van Eijck CH, den Bakker MA. Pigmented black neuroendocrine tumour of the pancreas diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathology 2010;21(4):270-272 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Richmond AM, Mehrotra S. Two unusual variants of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and their potential pitfalls on fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45(4):371-378 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Yachida S, Vakiani E, White CM, Zhong Y, Saunders T, Morgan R, et al. Small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the pancreas are genetically similar and distinct from well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 2012;36(2):173-184 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. Fryer E, Serra S, Chetty R. Lipid-rich (“clear cell”) neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas in MEN I patients. Endocr Pathol 2012;23(4):243-246 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Rossi G, Nannini N, Bertolini F, Mengoli MC, Fano R, Cavazza A. Clear cell carcinoid of the appendix: an uncommon variant of lipid-rich neuroendocrine tumor with a broad differential diagnosis. Endocr Pathol 2010;21(4):258-262 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Chen S, Wu HH, Cramer H. Fine needle aspiration cytology of a clear cell (lipid-rich) pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour in a patient without von Hippel-Lindau disease. Cytopathology 2013;24(3):197-198 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. Safo AO, Li RW, Vickers SM, Schmechel SC, Pambuccian SE. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of clear-cell pancreatic endocrine neoplasm in a patient with von Hippel-Lindau disease: a case report. Diagn Cytopathol 2009;37(5):365-372 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. Buckley K, Li Z. Diagnosing clear cell neuroendocrine tumors on cytological specimens: Report of two cases and brief literature review. Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45(8):757-760 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  23. Levy GH, Finkelstein A, Harigopal M, Chhieng D, Cai G. Cytoplasmic vacuolization: an under-recognized cytomorphologic feature in endocrine tumors of the pancreas. Diagn Cytopathol 2013;41(7):623-628 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Kaur G, Bakshi P, Singla V, Verma K. Clear cell neuroendocrine tumor of pancreas: Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration diagnosis of an uncommon variant. Cytojournal 2016;13:7 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. Gnarra JR, Tory K, Weng Y, Schmidt L, Wei MH, Li H, et al. Mutations of the VHL tumour suppressor gene in renal carcinoma. Nat Genet 1994;7(1):85-90 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Haynes CM, Sangoi AR, Pai RK. PAX8 is expressed in pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and in extrapancreatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas in fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2011;119(3):193-201 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Sangoi AR, Ohgami RS, Pai RK, Beck AH, McKenney JK, Pai RK. PAX8 expression reliably distinguishes pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors from ileal and pulmonary well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 2011;24(3):412-424 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. Chen S, Wang X, Lin J. Fine needle aspiration of oncocytic variants of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: a report of three misdiagnosed cases. Acta Cytol 2014;58(2):131-137 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  29. Reid MD, Stallworth CR, Lewis MM, Akkas G, Memis B, Basturk O, et al. Cytopathologic diagnosis of oncocytic type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: Criteria and clinical implications of accurate diagnosis. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124(2):122-134 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Pacchioni D, Papotti M, Macrì L, Forte G, Bussolati G. Pancreatic oncocytic endocrine tumors. Cytologic features of two cases. Acta Cytol 1996;40(4):742-746 View Article PubMed/NCBI