Mesonephric carcinoma (MC) is a rare type of cervical carcinoma that arises from mesonephric remnants. It is characterized by a mixture of a wide variety of growth patterns and typically exhibits positive immunoreactivity for GATA binding protein 3, thyroid transcription factor 1, and apical common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen. A subset of adenocarcinomas in the uterine corpus and ovary with similar morphology and immunophenotype is classified as mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) in the current World Health Organization classification. This review aimed to summarize the clinicopathological features of mesonephric remnants, mesonephric hyperplasia, and MC, provide an update on the current understanding of MLA, and highlight the molecular differences between MC and MLA.

A literature review was conducted on mesonephric remnants, mesonephric hyperplasia, MC, and MLA. The clinicopathological and molecular features were summarized from previously published studies and compared across these entities.

Both MC and MLA exhibit a mixture of growth patterns and show immunoreactivity for GATA binding protein 3, thyroid transcription factor 1, and common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen. They commonly harbor genetic alterations in KRAS and NRAS. However, key differences exist between these two entities. MC is associated with mesonephric remnants, whereas no such association has been identified for MLA. Additionally, although KRAS and NRAS mutations are common in both, a subset of MLA cases also harbors PIK3CA and/or PTEN mutations, genetic alterations commonly seen in endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Although the exact pathogenesis of MLA remains unclear, it is favored to originate from Müllerian-derived epithelium undergoing differentiation along the mesonephric pathway, rather than from true mesonephric remnants. Both MC and MLA tend to follow a relatively aggressive clinical course, underscoring the importance of accurate diagnosis.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition with significant health implications worldwide. In Nigeria, data on its prevalence and characteristics are limited, highlighting the need for comprehensive studies to better understand its epidemiology and clinical features in the region. This study aimed to assess the clinical presentation, endoscopic findings, and management challenges of IBD among patients undergoing colonoscopy in Nigeria.

Over five years (2019–2024), a multicenter, cross-sectional survey was conducted involving clinicians across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones. It included a retrospective review of records from 18 centers. Data collection was conducted in two phases via Google Forms, focusing on care practices and detailed case information, including demographics, clinical features, histology, and treatment. Data analysis used descriptive statistics and tests for associations, with significance set at p < 0.05.

A total of 459 suspected IBD cases (9.7%) were identified among over 4,700 colonoscopies, with histological confirmation in 208 cases (4.4%), indicating the prevalence of IBD in the Nigerian patient population. The most common subtype was ulcerative colitis (53.9%), followed by Crohn’s disease (21.0%) and indeterminate colitis (25.0%). Regional variations were observed, with higher diagnosis rates in some zones (North-West: 14.9%; South-East: 1.4%). The predominant clinical feature was rectal bleeding. Endoscopic findings frequently showed pan-colitis (62%), with significant regional differences (p < 0.001), and management mainly involved medications such as acetylsalicylic acid derivatives (60.0%), with surgical options rarely employed (0.6%). Challenges included high medication costs and limited availability, which affected nearly half of the patients (49.4%; 46.2%).

IBD, though under-recognized, is present in the Nigerian population, with notable regional variation in prevalence and presentation. The primary clinical features align with global patterns, and significant barriers, such as medication costs and availability, hinder effective management. Increasing awareness, improving diagnostic infrastructure, and addressing treatment challenges are essential to enhance care and outcomes for patients with IBD in Nigeria.