Breast cancer remains one of the most common cancers affecting women globally, with late detection frequently contributing to its high mortality rate. Multiple factors drive these delays, including a lack of awareness, financial constraints in low-income countries, and limited access to non-invasive and accurate biomarkers. This review aims to introduce biomarkers, particularly hematological and biochemical serum markers, as essential, non-invasive, and accurate tools for improving the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic management of breast cancer. Hematological markers are measurable blood parameters that reflect physiological and pathological processes such as inflammation, infection, cardiovascular stress, autoimmune conditions, and cancer. Routinely measured hematological markers, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and red blood cell indices, are typically obtained from standard tests like the complete blood count. Regular monitoring through complete blood count is essential during cancer treatment to evaluate changes in blood cell counts and detect potential adverse effects. Because of their affordability, minimal infrastructure requirements, and broad accessibility, hematological parameters have been increasingly studied for their association with high-risk factors in breast cancer, particularly in resource-limited settings. Their utility underscores their critical role in improving patient outcomes across diverse healthcare environments. This review summarizes the clinical value of various hematological and serum-based biochemical markers in the screening and diagnosis of breast cancer. Prediction methods that incorporate hematological and serum-based biochemical parameters can support screening, diagnosis, and staging. Overall, individual or combined blood indicators hold significant potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness.

Uterine fibroids (UFs) are common hormone-dependent tumors with a complex etiology involving both genetic and environmental factors. This study aimed to investigate, for the first time, the associations between loci from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and environmental risk factors in UF development, with a particular focus on gene–environment interactions.

DNA samples from 737 women with UF and 451 healthy controls were genotyped for ten UF-associated GWAS single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using probe-based polymerase chain reaction in this case-control study.

SNP rs66998222 (LOC102723323, G/A) was associated with decreased UF risk in the total sample (odds ratio (OR) = 0.81, p = 0.038) and in patients with a history of induced abortion (OR = 0.70, p = 0.009). SNP rs11031731 (THEM7P, WT1, G/A) increased UF risk overall (OR = 1.39, p = 0.01), and in women with abortion history (OR = 1.60, p = 0.008) or without pelvic inflammatory disease (OR = 1.43, p = 0.02). SNPs rs641760 (PITPNM2, C/T) and rs2553772 (LOC105376626, G/T) showed protective effects depending on abortion history. SNP rs1986649 (FOXO1, C/T) was associated with later UF onset (p = 0.049) and slower growth (p = 0.017). GWAS loci influence UF-related genes involved in proliferation, inflammation, and hormone metabolism, underscoring their pathogenic role.

Induced abortions and inflammation modify the effects of GWAS-identified UF risk loci, with allele-specific impacts on hormonal, inflammatory, and repair pathways. Replication in diverse cohorts is needed to validate these population-specific effects.