Amatoxin-containing mushroom poisoning causes fatal acute liver failure with >50% mortality despite maximal medical therapy. Interrupting the enterohepatic recirculation of amatoxins is a mechanistically rational but unproven therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biliary drainage (BD) in patients with pre-acute liver failure caused by amatoxin-containing mushroom poisoning.

In this prospective cohort study (ChiCTR2300073442), consecutive adults with amatoxin-induced pre-acute liver failure received standardized care (silibinin, N-acetylcysteine, dehydration). Patients undergoing percutaneous or endoscopic BD were compared to non-BD controls. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge.

Nine patients were enrolled (mean age: 63.3 ± 15.6 years; 44.4% female). All five patients who underwent BD (performed at a median of three days after ingestion) survived (100%), whereas only one of the four non-BD patients survived (25%; P = 0.048). BD initiated a rapid biochemical recovery: within 48 h, mean alanine and aspartate transaminase levels decreased by 67.6% and 91.6%, respectively, from their peak levels (P < 0.001), and the international normalized ratio decreased from 1.99 to 1.27 (P = 0.008). Non-survivors in the non-BD group progressed to multiorgan failure. Procedure-related complications (transient pancreatitis/amylasemia) occurred in three of the five BD patients but resolved with conservative management.

Timely BD was associated with 100% survival after amatoxin-induced pre-acute liver failure, contrasting sharply with 75% mortality in non-BD controls. The dramatic biochemical improvement after BD supports enterohepatic recirculation interruption as a mechanistic intervention. BD represents a potentially definitive, life-saving intervention for this lethal poisoning as a preliminary finding; larger, multicenter studies are required to confirm the observed association between BD and survival.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly reshaping diagnostic pathology, with breast pathology representing one of the most advanced and clinically impactful areas of adoption. Despite rapid progress, many practicing pathologists remain unfamiliar with core AI concepts and their practical implications. This review provides a concise and accessible overview of AI in breast pathology, focusing on foundational principles, current clinical applications, and future directions.

Pertinent literature was reviewed. Personal experiences were also summarized and incorporated.

Key AI concepts, including algorithms, models, architectures, machine learning, deep learning, neural networks, and multimodal and foundational models, are introduced to establish a common framework. Important distinctions among generative, black-box, and explainable AI are highlighted, emphasizing the need for transparency and interpretability in clinical settings. The evolution of AI in breast pathology is reviewed, from early rule-based computer-assisted diagnostic systems to modern deep learning approaches leveraging large-scale whole-slide imaging datasets. Current applications span multiple domains, including detection of lymph node metastases, Nottingham grading, classification of benign and malignant lesions, and automated quantification of critical biomarkers. AI-based approaches to prognosis, risk stratification, prediction of treatment response, and analysis of the tumor microenvironment are also discussed. Finally, the review addresses challenges associated with real-world implementation, including data quality, bias, regulatory considerations, cost, infrastructure, and workflow integration.

As AI continues to evolve toward large-scale, multimodal, and explainable models, it is expected to function as an augmentative tool rather than a replacement for pathologists, supporting diagnostic accuracy, standardization, and personalized management in breast cancer care.

Dysphagia, a severe comorbidity of many neurological diseases, often lacks targeted therapies. Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves represents a novel therapeutic class. This critical review assessed the clinical effectiveness and safety of various approaches for electrical stimulation of the cranial nerves for treating dysphagia, categorized as implantable (directly targeting the nerve), minimally invasive (pharyngeal electrical stimulation), and non-invasive (transcutaneous). A critical literature review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed database was comprehensively searched, and studies were rigorously assessed for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. The analysis included 15 clinical studies: four assessing vagus nerve stimulation (including implantable and transcutaneous approaches) and eleven assessing pharyngeal electrical stimulation. Most evaluated studies, particularly for pharyngeal electrical stimulation and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, demonstrated significant beneficial effects on validated dysphagia outcome measures. Importantly, no long-term severe adverse effects were reported across the evaluated stimulation approaches. Cumulative evidence indicates that vagus nerve stimulation and pharyngeal electrical stimulation approaches can effectively alleviate dysphagia symptoms. The different stimulation approaches appear to be complementary, with distinct profiles rendering them suitable for different therapeutic contexts (e.g., short-term hospital-based vs. long-term at-home treatment). Consequently, they represent distinct and valuable options for individualized dysphagia therapy.

Early risk stratification of severe acute liver injury (SLI) that may progress to acute liver failure (ALF), is vital for timely intervention, but no universal prognostic assessment tool covers both conditions. This study aimed to develop a simplified prognostic model for early risk assessment in SLI/ALF patients.

A retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled SLI patients (including those progressing to ALF) from July 1, 2020 to May 31, 2025. Baseline clinical and laboratory data on admission were collected, with 90-day transplant-free survival as the primary outcome. Independent prognostic factors were screened via Cox regression to build a simplified scoring model, whose performance was compared with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), King’s College Criteria (KCC), and the Acute Liver Failure Study Group Prognostic Index (ALFSG-PI).

Of 302 patients, 190 (62.9%) achieved 90-day transplant-free survival. Multivariate Cox regression identified international normalized ratio (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.118, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.050–1.191), platelet count (HR: 0.995, 95% CI: 0.993–0.998), and hepatic encephalopathy grade ≥ 2 (HR: 5.187, 95% CI: 3.403–7.907) as independent predictors, forming the HIP (derived from the above-mentioned three predictors) model. It showed good discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.82), outperforming MELD (AUC: 0.76, P = 0.019) and KCC (AUC: 0.72, P = 0.002), and performing comparably to ALFSG-PI (AUC: 0.80, P = 0.429). The model also performed robustly in ALF subgroups defined by the American College of Gastroenterology and the 2024 Chinese Medical Association guidelines (AUCs: 0.80 and 0.76, respectively) and achieved an AUC of 0.85 in the validation set.

The HIP model is a simple and effective tool for prognostic risk stratification in SLI/ALF patients, suitable for emergency and primary care to facilitate timely intervention.

Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are pervasive environmental contaminants with growing recognition as potential contributors to human disease. Widespread human exposure occurs primarily through ingestion of contaminated food and water, and MNPs have been detected in multiple human tissues, including the gastrointestinal tract. Experimental evidence provides a plausible biological basis for disease associations, including impairment of intestinal barrier integrity, activation of mucosal immune pathways, and alteration of gut microbial communities caused by MNP exposure. Although human data remain limited, early studies demonstrate MNP detection in stool and suggest potential correlations with inflammatory biomarkers such as fecal calprotectin. These findings, together with mechanistic data from in vitro and animal models, raise concern that MNP exposure represents a paradigm shift in the pathogenesis or modulation of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, methodological variability, small sample sizes, and contamination challenges currently limit definitive conclusions. The aim of this review is to evaluate the current understanding of MNP exposure and its impact on intestinal health, particularly in relation to IBD. We synthesize mechanistic and early clinical evidence linking MNPs to IBD and highlight critical research gaps. Future standardized exposure assessment, mechanistic validation in human systems, and longitudinal studies are essential to clarify causal relationships. Given the modifiable nature of environmental plastic exposure, advancing this field may offer new opportunities for IBD prevention and intervention.

This Consensus aims to establish a physician–pharmacist co-management model to standardize the rational clinical application of anti-immunoglobulin E monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of allergic asthma. Focusing on the critical components of physician–pharmacist co-management, key issues related to anti-immunoglobulin E monoclonal antibody therapy were identified through a systematic literature review and clinical practice experience. Evidence quality was evaluated using an evidence grading system, and the Delphi method was applied to reach expert consensus. Centered on omalizumab, the Consensus presents 12 recommendations covering the work model of physician–pharmacist co-management, clinical management pathways, hierarchical diagnosis and treatment systems, as well as training and competency assessment. The Delphi process achieved a high degree of consensus (agreement >80%) on 12 key recommendations, emphasizing a 60-min observation period post-injection and quarterly follow-up evaluations. It establishes a standardized framework for the co-management of omalizumab therapy in allergic asthma. Results highlighted that co-management effectively monitors omalizumab dosage (75–600 mg) and maintains a consensus threshold of >80% for patient safety protocols. The Consensus provides a standardized framework for physician–pharmacist co-management, which is expected to facilitate rational drug use and improve patient care pathways in omalizumab therapy.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a major global health problem. The main treatments are surgery and chemoradiotherapy. A drawback of the latter is that repeated treatments are likely to lead to cancer cells developing resistance to the drug, resulting in recurrence, development of metastases, and poor prognosis for patients. Consequently, there is interest in combining chemoradiotherapy with treatment using active components extracted from natural products. One such component is resveratrol (RVT), which is a natural anti-tumor ingredient extracted from plants. Although there are many reviews on the biological activity of RVT, only a few studies have been performed to investigate the diversity of protein binding of RVT with OC and the application of various novel drug formulations containing RVT to treat OC. The review presented here may provide some ideas for the prevention and treatment of OC.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major global public health challenge. Current therapies based on nucleos(t)ide analogues and interferon mainly achieve long-term viral suppression, whereas only a small proportion of patients attain a functional cure, defined as sustained hepatitis B surface antigen loss with hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA below the limit of quantification for at least 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation, with or without anti-HBs seroconversion. Emerging evidence from the gut–liver axis indicates that gut microbiota–derived metabolites, particularly short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and bile acids (BAs), modulate the HBV life cycle and immune regulation in CHB, thereby offering therapeutic targets to overcome immune tolerance. This review summarizes the biological characteristics of SCFAs and BAs and their mechanistic roles across different stages of HBV infection, with emphasis on translational relevance. In vitro and animal studies suggest that butyrate and related SCFAs suppress HBV gene expression by inhibiting histone deacetylases and remodeling covalently closed circular DNA minichromatin. SCFAs may also enhance antiviral immunity, although they may reinforce immune tolerance in certain contexts. For BAs, the farnesoid X receptor, Takeda G protein–coupled receptor 5, and the HBV entry receptor sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide form a key signaling hub with dual effects on viral replication and host responses. Early-phase studies suggest that farnesoid X receptor agonists, pegylated interferon-α, or nucleos(t)ide analogues are associated with hepatitis B surface antigen reductions, though larger trials are needed. This review proposes biomarker-guided stratification and multi-target combination strategies to improve functional cure rates in CHB.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) lacks a universally accepted definition, and recent efforts have proposed consensus organ failure criteria. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical validity of a recently proposed consensus ACLF framework with the outcome-calibrated A-TANGO classification.

We performed a multinational cohort study including 2,398 patients from the TIH cohort (India) and 2,568 from the CATCH-LIFE cohort (China) who were hospitalized with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. ACLF was defined using A-TANGO and an operationalized version of the 2025 consensus framework. Outcomes were 28- and 90-day mortality. Analyses assessed case capture, overlap, mortality risk, sensitivity, specificity, and net reclassification improvement (NRI).

ACLF prevalence differed substantially by definition. In TIH, A-TANGO classified 79.2% as ACLF versus 42.3% by the consensus definition; in CATCH-LIFE, the corresponding values were 31.4% versus 5.8%, respectively. Most consensus ACLF cases were captured by A-TANGO, which additionally classified 26%–37% of patients as having ACLF. These patients had substantial mortality (28-day: 18.1%–26.9%; 90-day: 33.2%–37.9%), significantly higher than those negative by both frameworks and comparable to established ACLF risk thresholds. A-TANGO showed higher sensitivity for 28-day mortality (TIH: 94.1% vs. 67.8%; CATCH-LIFE: 76.1% vs. 25.6%), whereas consensus criteria were more specific. Reclassification analyses showed improved discrimination with A-TANGO (NRI: 17.1% in TIH; 27.4% in CATCH-LIFE). Within the consensus non-ACLF group, A-TANGO further stratified patients into distinct risk groups with stepwise increase in mortality.

In conclusion, the two frameworks identify fundamentally different populations. The consensus definition significantly reduces sensitivity and under-recognizes high-risk patients. Compared with consensus definitions, the outcome-calibrated framework better supports diagnosis, clinical decision-making, risk stratification, and trial design in ACLF.