Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant neoplasm that is relatively common in children but rare in young adults, accounting for less than 1% of all intracranial tumors. This study reports a rare case of MB metastasis to the right temporoparietal region in a 42-year-old woman, presenting with focal neurological symptoms such as weakness in the left arm and leg, speech disturbances, and impaired coordination. The patient had a history of cerebellar MB and underwent surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Despite treatment, metastasis occurred, highlighting the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in adult MB cases. The article also reviews the literature on MB in young adults, emphasizing the importance of dynamic neuroclinical monitoring and timely instrumental diagnosis for early detection and management of MB metastases.

Accumulating evidence indicates that fecal syndecan-2 (SDC2) methylation is a promising biomarker for early detection of colorectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of fecal SDC2 methylation testing for adenomas and evaluate the risk stratification efficacy of the Asia-Pacific Colorectal Screening Scoring (APCS) combined with SDC2 methylation status.

This was a prospective, multicenter diagnostic study. Adult participants with no history of colonoscopy within the past three years were enrolled. Demographic data were collected, and APCS scores were evaluated. All participants underwent fecal SDC2 methylation testing and colonoscopy. Colonoscopy outcomes and pathological results of any polyps served as reference standards. The fecal SDC2 methylation test and reference standard assessments were conducted in a blinded manner. The APCS-SDC2 scoring system was developed by integrating fecal SDC2 methylation results with APCS scores, and its efficacy was assessed.

In total, 985 participants were enrolled, among whom 62 (6.3%) tested positive for fecal SDC2 methylation. The sensitivity and specificity of fecal SDC2 methylation in detecting advanced adenomas were 31.3% (95% confidence interval (CI): 21.6–42.7%) and 96.1% (95% CI: 94.6–97.2%), respectively. The APCS-SDC2 scoring system demonstrated superior discriminatory performance for advanced adenomas (area under the curve: 0.7032; 95% CI: 0.5869–0.8195). For advanced adenoma screening, the specificity of the APCS-SDC2 score was higher than that of the APCS score (86.7% vs. 66.7%; P < 0.001).

A positive fecal SDC2 methylation test indicated a higher risk of advanced adenoma, and colonoscopy should be prioritized. The APCS-SDC2 scoring system demonstrated superior risk stratification performance for advanced adenomas.

DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic subunit A (POLE) gene plays a crucial role in DNA repair and chromosomal replication. Mutations in the POLE gene have been linked to cancer, particularly colorectal carcinoma (CRC). However, the genomic landscape and pathological significance of POLE mutant CRC remain underreported. This study aimed to characterize the clinicopathologic features and genomic landscape of CRC harboring POLE mutations and to investigate the implications of co-occurring genetic alterations.

We identified thirty-four CRC cases with POLE mutations from our institution’s database using the next-generation sequencing gene panels including 161-gene panel for the cases of 2016–2021 and the 505-gene panel for the case of 2022–2023. We collected clinicopathologic data (age, sex, tumor site, and grading) and conducted comprehensive next-generation sequencing. Survival outcomes were assessed by reviewing patients’ medical records at the time of data collection, with survival status determined based on the most recent clinical follow-up available with overall survival as the primary endpoint and a median follow-up time of 20.5 months. Statistical analyses, including chi-squared testing and CoMutation plotting, were performed using Python.

The enrolled 34 patients had a median age of 60.5 years (range: 37–84); tumors were in the colon (26 cases, 77%) and rectum (8 cases, 23%), with a mismatch repair deficiency rate of 29%. Next-generation sequencing analysis of a 505-gene panel revealed that POLE mutations were predominantly missense (89%). The mutations were distributed across various domains: 11.4% in the exonuclease domain, 25.7% in the catalytic domain, 20% in an unknown functional domain, and 42.9% in a nonfunctional domain. The average number of genomic mutations per case was 12.1 ± 12.3. CoMutation analysis identified two subsets: genomic mutation high (>5 mutations, range 6–60 mutations, n = 22) and mutation low (. Notably, TP53 mutations occurred in 55% of cases, and defects in double-stranded DNA repair proteins occurred in 47% of cases. POLE mutant CRC with co-occurring DNA repair mutations exhibited a significantly higher total number of genomic mutations (19.9 ± 14.4, range 7–60 mutations; chi-squared = 5.1, p-value = 0.02). Although a survival comparison between TP53 wild-type and TP53 mutant subgroups of POLE-mutant CRC is not statistical significant (p = 0.37), it showed a trend toward better survival in the TP53 wild-type group.

Our findings reveal unique genomic landscapes in POLE mutant CRC, particularly with co-occurring TP53 or double-stranded DNA repair mutations, which are critical in colorectal carcinogenesis. These tumors demonstrate increased genetic instability, highlighting potential for immunotherapy.

Reporting quality in clinical research is critical for evidence-based medicine and reproducibility of clinical studies. Previous work has mostly focused on the reporting quality of clinical trials and observational longitudinal studies. However, few studies have examined the reporting quality of trend analyses. Moreover, the reporting of recommended statistical metrics in trend analyses remains largely unclear. Therefore, we assessed the reporting quality of trend analyses based on reporting of recommended statistical metrics. We systematically searched the PubMed for the trend-analysis articles published in 10 leading medicine and oncology journals over an 11-year period (2008–2018). Studies published after 2019 were excluded due to a sudden, significant increase in publication numbers during and immediately after the COVID-19 pandemic. Only original articles, research letters, and meta-analyses/systematic reviews were included. We scored the reporting quality of these articles based on whether they reported p-values, effect sizes, beta/coefficient/slope/annual-percentage-change (APC). 297 articles met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 193 (66.0%) reported p-values and 216 (72.7%) reported effect sizes. Only 13 (5.8%) analyses reported neither p-values/effect sizes nor beta/coefficient/slope/APC. In multivariable regression models, authors affiliated with epidemiology departments were less likely to report effect sizes, whereas those from statistics departments were more likely to do so. Interestingly, U.S.-based senior authors (versus non-U.S.) more likely reported p-values. No factors were independently associated with reporting APC. Overall, the reporting quality of trend analyses in leading medicine and oncology journals appears moderate and warrants improvement. We thus call for increased awareness and further research on reporting quality in trend analyses in oncology research and beyond.