Micro- and nanoplastics (MNPs) are plastic particles smaller than 5 mm and 1 µm, respectively, and are emerging environmental pollutants with growing implications for human health. These particles stem from either ‘primary sources’, such as intentionally manufactured microbeads and industrial abrasives, or ‘secondary sources’, where larger plastic items break down into smaller fragments over time. Human exposure primarily occurs through ingestion and inhalation, with contaminated seafood and plastic-laden food packaging representing key routes of entry. Once ingested, MNPs can cross the intestinal barrier, accumulate in gastrointestinal (GI) tissues, and trigger biological responses. Mechanistic studies reveal that MNPs induce oxidative stress, DNA damage, chronic inflammation, and endocrine disruption, all of which are hallmarks of carcinogenic pathways. They also alter gut microbiota, potentially promoting dysbiosis and immune dysregulation. The GI tract is particularly vulnerable to these effects due to direct luminal mucosal contact and high epithelial turnover. Epidemiological data remain limited, but early evidence supports a plausible link between MNPs exposure and GI malignancies. Such findings are particularly concerning given the increasing global incidence and early age presentation of colorectal and esophageal cancers. Given that MNPs may represent a modifiable environmental risk factor in GI cancer prevention, public health strategies must prioritize reducing plastic exposure, promoting antioxidant-rich diets, and improving environmental monitoring. This review explores the potential carcinogenic effects of microplastics while also examining their emerging roles in cancer therapeutics. It highlights critical avenues for future investigation and underscores the importance of cross-disciplinary efforts to tackle this growing global health concern.

Medulloblastoma (MB) is a malignant neoplasm that is relatively common in children but rare in young adults, accounting for less than 1% of all intracranial tumors. This study reports a rare case of MB metastasis to the right temporoparietal region in a 42-year-old woman, presenting with focal neurological symptoms such as weakness in the left arm and leg, speech disturbances, and impaired coordination. The patient had a history of cerebellar MB and underwent surgical resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. Despite treatment, metastasis occurred, highlighting the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in adult MB cases. The article also reviews the literature on MB in young adults, emphasizing the importance of dynamic neuroclinical monitoring and timely instrumental diagnosis for early detection and management of MB metastases.

Microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer, which accounts for roughly 80–85% of cases, remains largely refractory to immune checkpoint inhibitors compared with microsatellite instability-high tumors. This review synthesizes current evidence on tumor-intrinsic and microenvironmental mechanisms underlying immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer—including low neoantigen burden and impaired antigen presentation, activation of Wnt/β-catenin and MAPK signaling that exclude T cells, an immunosuppressive cellular milieu (regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, M2-like tumor-associated macrophages, cancer-associated fibroblasts), metabolic reprogramming, and gut microbiome dysbiosis—and evaluates translational strategies aimed at overcoming these barriers. Preclinical and early-phase clinical data indicate that rational, mechanism-guided combinations (vascular normalization, myeloid reprogramming, metabolic inhibitors, antigen-priming approaches, and microbiome modulation) can enhance immune infiltration and produce benefits in biomarker-defined subgroups. Moving the field forward will require biomarker-driven, adaptive clinical trials with embedded translational endpoints to optimize patient selection and manage toxicity.

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is the most common focal epilepsy, with many patients developing drug-resistant epilepsy. Surgical interventions, including stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided temporal lobe resection (TLR) and SEEG-guided responsive neurostimulation (RNS), are key treatment options. This systematic review compares the efficacy and safety of these interventions in drug-resistant TLE.

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search of multiple databases was performed (January 23–February 14, 2025). Eligible studies included adult patients with drug-resistant TLE undergoing SEEG-guided TLR or RNS (where SEEG was used pre-implant for localization). Primary outcomes assessed included seizure freedom, seizure reduction, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL) improvements. Quality assessments were performed using appropriate tools for randomized and observational studies.

Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 10 to 440 participants. SEEG-guided TLR achieved an average seizure freedom rate of 58.5% (range: 32–85%) and a mean seizure reduction of 75% (range: 60–90%). SEEG-guided RNS resulted in an average seizure freedom rate of 12.85% and seizure reduction of 63.2%, with variability across studies. QoL improvements were reported in 80–82% of patients. Adverse events were infrequent but varied between interventions.

This review highlights the effectiveness of SEEG-guided TLR and RNS in managing drug-resistant TLE. While both interventions reduce seizure burden and improve QoL, seizure freedom rates are higher with resection. However, gaps remain in understanding long-term cognitive outcomes and demographic influences on treatment response. Future research should address these factors to refine patient selection and optimize epilepsy care.