Publications > Journals > Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology > Article Full Text

  • OPEN ACCESS

CA-125 Significance in Cirrhosis and Correlation with Disease Severity and Portal Hypertension

  • Julio Collazos*
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology 2018;():-

DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2018.00056

Published online:

 Author information

Edula et al.1 in their retrospective study of 172 patients concluded that serum concentrations of cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) are elevated in cirrhotic patients with ascites. This relationship has been well known for several decades,26 as well as the relationship of CA-125 with pleural and pericardial effusions, among many other non-malignant conditions,4,5,7 because CA-125 is expressed in the coelomic epithelium.8 In fact, ascitic fluid concentrations of CA-125 are even higher than in serum.2

Edula et al.1 said that cirrhotic patients without ascites had normal mean CA-125 concentrations, and define this observation as “a new finding”. However, these observations are not new. More than 25 years ago our group published a prospective and comprehensive study of 159 patients with liver diseases, including 85 cirrhotics with and without ascites.3 In this article, cited by Edula et al. as their reference 14, we found the same results as Edula et al.1 reported for ascitic and non-ascitic patients.1 Moreover, our group published other articles focused exclusively on patients without ascites.9,10 Like Edula et al.,1 we found that elevations of CA-125 concentrations in patients without ascites were uncommon, but also that these elevations were related to the degree of liver dysfunction.

Therefore, CA-125 increases markedly (even 100 times above the upper normal level) in patients with ascites, an increase that we previously found to be highly proportional to the amount of ascites as measured semiquantitatively in 5 degrees, and it decreases rapidly with the diminution of ascites. In fact, CA-125 proved to be a reliable marker of ascites (sensitivity 98.4%, specificity 95.9%, positive predictive value 93.8%, negative predictive value 98.9%, efficiency 96.9%).3

Although to a considerably lower degree, and much more infrequently, we also previously found increased CA-125 concentrations in some patients who did not have ascites, as evaluated ultrasonographically, as well as significant correlations between CA-125 and some liver function markers, such as albumin and prothrombin.9 Our findings suggested that, apart from the determinant role of ascites, liver dysfunction itself is also responsible for moderate increases in the serum concentrations of CA-125, probably due to a poor metabolization of this glycoprotein.9,10

On the other hand, the absence of statistical significance regarding portal hypertension (p = 0.1) reported by Edula et al.1 is surprising, considering that the differences in the CA-125 concentrations that they found were substantial (414 vs. 256 U/mL) and that portal hypertension is tightly related to ascites. The authors evaluated portal hypertension by a history of esophageal varices. Besides the limited sensitivity of this method to detect portal hypertension, perhaps the number of patients studied was too small (Type II error). Also, the parametric tests used by the authors for statistical calculations (t-test, ANOVA) might have been inappropriate, as we found that the distribution of CA-125 was markedly non-Gaussian, and the illustrations of Edula et al.1 suggest the same.

In our series, we found marked differences in CA-125 concentrations in patients with or without portal hypertension, as evaluated separately by three different methods: echography, esophageal varices and splenomegaly (p < 0.0001 for each).3 Even portal hypertension was associated with higher CA-125 concentrations in patients without ascites (p = 0.049).9

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The author has no conflict of interest related to this publication.

References

  1. Edula RG, Muthukuru S, Moroianu S, Wang Y, Lingiah V, Fung P. CA-125 significance in cirrhosis and correlation with disease severity and portal hypertension: A retrospective study. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2018;6:241-246 View Article
  2. Bergmann JF, Bidart JM, George M, Beaugrand M, Levy VG, Bohuon C. Elevation of CA 125 in patients with benign and malignant ascites. Cancer 1987;59:213-217 View Article
  3. Collazos J, Genolla J, Ruibal A. CA 125 serum levels in patients with non-neoplastic liver diseases. A clinical and laboratory study. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1992;52:201-206 View Article
  4. Eerdekens MW, Nouwen EJ, Pollet DE, Briers TW, De Broe ME. Placental alkaline phosphatase and cancer antigen 125 in sera of patients with benign and malignant diseases. Clin Chem 1985;31:687-690
  5. Mezger J, Wilmanns W, Lamerz R. Elevated serum CA 125 levels in patients with benign ascitic or pleural effusions. Tumour Biol 1988;9:47-52 View Article
  6. Bergmann JF, Beaugrand M, Labadie H, Bidart JM, Bohuon C. CA 125 (ovarian tumour-associated antigen) in ascitic liver diseases. Clin Chim Acta 1986;155:163-165 View Article
  7. Touitou Y, Bogdan A. Tumor markers in non-malignant diseases. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1988;24:1083-1091
  8. Kabawat SE, Bast RC, Bhan AK, Welch WR, Knapp RC, Colvin RB. Tissue distribution of a coelomic-epithelium-related antigen recognized by the monoclonal antibody OC125. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1983;2:275-285 View Article
  9. Collazos J, Genolla J, Allende MT, Ruibal A. Serum CA 125 levels in patients with non-malignant liver diseases without ascites. Clin Investig 1993;71:239 View Article
  10. Ruibal A, Siuriana R. Evidence of a relationship between high serum Ca 125 and liver failure pattern in cirrhotic patients without ascitis and jaundice. Int J Biol Markers 1986;1:55-56 View Article
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology
  • pISSN 2225-0719
  • eISSN 2310-8819