Publications > Journals > Journal of Exploratory Research in Pharmacology > Article Full Text


Ferroptosis-related Gene Model and Nomogram Predict the Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Xue-Shan Huang1,#,
  • Zheng Zhu2,#,
  • Xiao-Ling Li3,
  • Hui Luo4,5,6 and
  • Lian-Xiang Luo4,5,6,* 
 Author information
Journal of Exploratory Research in Pharmacology 2022;():-

doi: 10.14218/JERP.2021.00036


Background and objectives

Ferroptosis is a form of programmed cell necrosis with unique mechanisms. However, the ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) in the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been clarified.


In this research, the corresponding clinical data and original mRNA transcripts for HCC patients were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas. A new survival model of 10 FRGs was established using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis. The risk scores of these genes and HCC stages were analyzed for independent risk factors for the worst survival. The enrichment scores of different immune cells and immune-related pathways were analyzed by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). The prognostic risk characteristics associated with clinical characteristics were analyzed for independent prognostic indicators for the survival of HCC patients.


The 10 gene signatures (ACACA, SLC7A11, SQSTM1, SRXN1, SLC2A1, SLC38A1, MYB, ZFP69B, G6PD, STMN1) were used for a prognostic model for HCC. Compared with the low-risk group, the high-risk group had a worse prognosis and lower survival rate. The validation results revealed that the risk model was a better measure for the prognosis of HCC patients. Combined with the clinical characteristics, a nomogram with good prognostic prediction was established. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that immune-related pathways were highly enriched, including the highly enriched T cell-related pathway.


The risk model for ferroptosis-related risk signatures is valuable for the prognosis of HCC patients. However, our findings require further validation.


Ferroptosis, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Prognosis, Immune


Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most deadly cancer with a low 5-year survival rate and poor prognosis.1 Previous studies have shown that liver cancer has an incidence of approximately 850,000 cases annually.2 It is well-known that the primary risk factors for liver cancer include chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, water pollution, and chemical carcinogens. Patients with liver cirrhosis can progress to HCC. Hence, the prevention and prediction of liver cirrhosis are crucial to prevent liver cancer development. A recent transcriptome meta-analysis indicated that targeting the lysophosphatidic acid pathway was the primary chemical preventive measure in >500 patients with liver cirrhosis.3 Of note, the survival rate of liver cancer has decreased significantly recently, although the 5-year survival rate of advanced liver cancer remains approximately 5%.4 The prognosis for patients with HCC remains controversial. Therefore, the discovery of biomarkers for the prognosis of HCC is urgently required.5,6

Ferroptosis is a novel form of a regulated cell death pathway, and its discovery has helped to explore the role of iron metabolism in the development and progression of cancers. It is characterized by the excessive accumulation of lipid peroxidation products that cause oxidative damage, which is dependent on iron ions and the mitochondrial chain.7 Several factors contribute to ferroptosis. First, glutathione peroxidase (GPX4) can convert lipid peroxides into non-toxic lipid alcohols and its deficiency results in the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROC) and a decline in the antioxidant capacity in cells, leading to ferroptosis and oxidative cell death.8 In addition, ferroptosis is regulated by defective oxidoreductase FSP1 (AIFM2), GCH1, and its product tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4). Functionally, ferroptosis contributes to the pathogenesis of diseases, including various cancers. Significantly, the nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) is one of the selective cargo receptors for ferritinophagy. NCOA4 overexpression increases the degradation of ferritin and promotes ferroptosis.9,10 Previous research found that many types of tumor cells are prone to drug-induced ferroptosis.11 Therefore, it is essential to explore and determine the ferroptosis-related biomarkers for the prognosis of HCC patients.

Recently, target otherapy has become attractive and benefits HCC patients.12 Sorafenib can inhibit the growth of HCC by targeting the Raf/MEK/ERK signaling,13,14 and attenuates tumor angiogenesis by blocking the vascular endothelial and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. Immunotherapy by targeting immune checkpoints is a promising method to kill tumor cells by enhancing T cell activity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors enhance T cell immunity against tumors and benefit patients with hematologic malignancies and those with some types of solid tumors.15 Therefore, it is vital to discover the immune biomarkers for the response to immunotherapy and the prognosis of HCC patients.

In the present study, the ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) in HCC patients were screened and identified in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and a prognostic signature was constructed using 10 genes for the prognosis of HCC patients, which was validated in the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) database. Furthermore, the signature was used to establish a model and determine its value in the prognosis of HCC patients. Then, the immunotumor environment of HCC was analyzed. Finally, a nomogram was constructed using the signature genes to predict the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) of HCC. Our data indicated that the model was valuable for the prognosis of HCC. Our findings might help to predict the therapeutic response to immunotherapies in HCC patients and provide new insights into the pathogenic role of ferroptosis in the pathogenesis of HCC.

Materials and methods

Data collection

The demographic, clinical, and transcriptomic data of HCC patients were acquired from the TCGA database, which included 374 HCC and 50 adjacent non-tumor samples. the data was validated from the ICGC portal and these samples were from patients with chronic HBV or HCV infection in Japan. The data were analyzed using the algorithm in the limma R package.16

Identification of differentially expressed genes

The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) relative to ferroptosis were defined when one gene expression between the control and HCC tissues reached significant (|logFC| > 1 and adjusted p < 0.05) with a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05, determined using the R package limma in R software (version 4.0.5).17

Construction and validation of a prognostic ferroptosis-related gene signature

The significance of individual DEGs was determined by univariate Cox analysis for the OS of HCC patients, and only DEGs with a p-value < 0.001 were chosen for the following analysis. Finally, the R package glmnet was applied for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis, and the prognostic candidates for ferroptosis-related DEGs were obtained by tenfold cross-validation lambda (λ) value.18 The expression levels of different genes were the independent variables for LASSO regression and the survival rate and status were the dependent variables for patients with HCC. A prediction model was established for the analysis of the risk of FRGs using the Cox regression coefficient weighted estimation method.19 The prognostic FRGs signatures were manifested as:20

Risk score=i=1ncoefficientExpressionnn of FRG.

To better predict the prognosis of HCC, an ROC curve was used to predict the OS of HCC patients.21 The survival of patients with HCC in TCGA and ICGC was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method and analyzed by the log-rank test. Then, an independent prognostic analysis was performed to evaluate the clinical features of OS-independent prognostic factors.22 The data were further analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce their dimensionality. In addition, the distribution of HCC patients in each group was analyzed by t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE).23

Function enrichment analysis of DEGs in TCGA and ICGC cohorts

To explain the biological enrichment pathway related to the risk score, gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis were conducted based on the R package clusterProfiler with high and low-risk groups of DEGs (|log2FC| ≥ 1, FDR < 0.05).16 The DEGs involved in the immune function-related pathways were further analyzed.24,25 Finally, the activity of 13 immune-related pathways and 16 types of immune infiltrates were analyzed by the single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA algorithm) using the gsva R package.26

Construction of predictive nomogram

A nomogram was established for the prognosis of HCC patients.27 The R package rms was used to assess the value of the nomogram in predicting the OS. Finally, the nomogram included risk score and clinical stage and was used to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of HCC patients. The calibration curves for 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were performed for verification of the power and accuracy of prognosis prediction.28 The C index was used to evaluate the performance of each model. The different models were compared using the rms R package.

Statistical analysis

The HCC patients in the TCGA training cohort were stratified into high and low-risk groups, based on the median risk score. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses determined the independent prognostic parameters. The survival of HCC patients was estimated by the K-M method and analyzed by a log-rank test using the survival R package. The sensitivity and specificity of the nomogram to predict the OS of HCC patients were analyzed by ROC curves using the R package pROC. The difference between groups was analyzed by a Chi-squared test and Student’s t-test. All statistical analyses were performed using R 4.0.5, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Research process and patients’ characteristics

For simplicity, a flow chart (Fig. 1) was constructed that started with a cohort of 422 HCC patients in the TCGA-LIHC and a validation cohort of 260 HCC patients in the ICGC. Their demographic and clinical data are shown in Table 1. The patients’ characteristics included age, tumor Gleason grade, gender, T, M and N stage, and survival status. In addition, 291 FRGs were acquired from FerrDb database ( ) and the human gene database (Gene Cards) with the keywords “Ferroptosis” ( ).

Flow chart of study design.
Fig. 1  Flow chart of study design.
Table 1

The demographic and clinical characteristics of HCC patients

CaseTCGA cohort
LIRI-TP cohort
  Grade 155(14.6%)NA
  Grade 2180(47.8%)NA
  Grade 3124(32.9%)NA
N(Lymph Node)(%)
Survival status(%)

Identification of prognostic ferroptosis-related DEGs in the TCGA cohort

To determine the association of ferroptosis-related DEGs with the OS of HCC patients using univariate Cox regression analysis, 32 ferroptosis-related DEGs were significantly associated with the OS of HCC patients (p < 0.001) (Table 2). Based on the criteria of FDR < 0.05 and |log2FoldChange| > 1, these FRGs were differentially expressed between 374 HCC and 50 non-tumor liver samples in the TCGA database. Further univariate Cox regression analyses indicated that these 19 ferroptosis-related DEGs were associated with the OS of HCC patients (Fig. 2e). The forest plot of hazard ratios (HRs) displayed that the majority of these DEGs were risk factors for a worse prognosis in HCC patients (Figs. 2b, 2d). These DEGs connected to form a network (Fig. 2c) and among these genes, SLC2A1, SLC38A1, and SLC7A11 were the hub genes (Fig. 2a).

Table 2

Univariate Cox regression analysis of 32 ferroptosis-related DEGs for OS of HCC patients

IdHRHR.95LHR.95HP value
Screening of candidate FRGs in TCGA cohort.
Fig. 2  Screening of candidate FRGs in TCGA cohort.

(a) constructing a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network, downloaded from the STRING database ( ) indicated the interactions between the candidate genes;(b) 19 identified candidate genes related to the HCC risks by univariate Cox regression analysis. p < 0.001 was statistically significant; (c) correlation network of candidate genes; (d) heatmap of candidate genes expression between groups of HCC patients. The 19 overlapping genes were all upregulated in tumor tissues; and (e) identification of FRGs with prognostic values.

Construction of a prognostic model with good performance in the TCGA cohort

A risk prognosis model was constructed based on 10 FRGs with a risk for worse OS of HCC patients by LASSO regression analysis. To avoid collinearity, the prognostic DEGs were entered into a LASSO regression. Furthermore, a 10-gene signature was generated that was significantly associated with the prognosis with an optimal value of λ (Fig. 3d, e). The coefficient of these 10 genes is exhibited in Table 3. A prognostic model was generated to evaluate the prognosis of each HCC patient as follow:

Risk score = ACACA * 0.004266 + G6PD * 0.071354 + MYB * 0.117039 + SLC2A1 * 0.109265 + SLC38A1 * 0.031264 + SLC7A11 * 0.121545 + SQSTM1 * 0.020266 + SRXN1 * 0.227654 + STMN1 * 0.126750 + ZFP69B * 0.496697.

Correlation of clinical characteristics and LASSO regression analysis in TCGA cohort.
Fig. 3  Correlation of clinical characteristics and LASSO regression analysis in TCGA cohort.

(a) heatmap shows the relationship of the 10 genes risk signature with clinic pathological measures; (b and c) GO and KEGG analyses of ferroptosis-related DEGs; (d) screening of optimal parameter (λ) at which the vertical lines were drawn; and (e) LASSO coefficient spectrum of 10 genes in HCC.

Table 3

LASSO-penalized Cox analysis identifies 10 genes to build a prognostic model


The K-M curve exhibited worse survival in the high-risk group of HCC patients (p < 0.001, Fig. 4a). The condition of risk score and survival status in the TCGA cohort is shown in Figure 4c–d. The PCA and t-SNE of the TCGA cohort separated both groups (Fig. 4e–f). Then, the predictive ability of the risk score was estimated for the time-dependent ROC curve in the TCGA cohort, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) reached 0.790, 0.705, and 0.678 for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS in this population, respectively (Fig. 4b). Therefore, this risk model had good reliability and specificity.

Construction of the signature model in the TCGA cohort.
Fig. 4  Construction of the signature model in the TCGA cohort.

(a) K-M survival curves of the model for OS of HCC patients; (b) time-dependent ROC curves and AUCs for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS of HCC patients; (c) distribution and median value of the risk scores; (d) survival status of HCC patients; (e) PCA analysis of HCC patients in the TCGA cohort; and (f) t-SNE of HCC patients in the TCGA cohort.

Validation of the prognostic model in the ICGC cohort

To validate the value of the prediction model from the TCGA database, 260 HCC samples from ICGC were used to validate the ferroptosis-related prognostic model. These HCC patients were stratified into two high and low-risk groups (Fig. 5c). The patients in the high-risk group had significantly worse OS than those in the low-risk group (Fig. 5a). In addition, the ROC curve demonstrated that the AUCs of HCC patients for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 0.704, 0.695, and 0.684 (Fig. 5b). Compared with the TCGA cohort, the PCA and t-SNE analysis indicated that patients in both subgroups were different (Fig. 5e–f). In addition, the OS was significantly lower, and the mortality rate was higher in the high-risk group than those in the low-risk group of HCC patients (Fig. 5d).

Validation of the signature model in the ICGC cohort.
Fig. 5  Validation of the signature model in the ICGC cohort.

(a) K-M survival curves of the model for OS of HCC patients; (b) time-dependent ROC curves and AUCs for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS of HCC patients; (c) distribution and median value of the risk scores; (d) survival status of HCC patients; (e) PCA analysis of HCC patients in the ICGC cohort; and (f) t-SNE of HCC patients in the ICGC cohort.

Functional enrichment analysis of the ferroptosis-related signature

To further investigate the potential functions and pathways related to risk prognosis, GO and KEGG analyses revealed that the DEGs associated with HCC prognosis were enriched in extracellular matrix receptor (ECM-receptor) interaction, rheumatoid arthritis, phagosome, human T cell leukemia virus 1 infection, and others (Fig. 6b–d). Of note, the DEGs in the TCGA cohorts were significantly enriched in many immune-related pathways, such as humoral immune response, immunoglobulin complex, and humoral immune response (adjusted p < 0.05, Fig. 6a). In addition, GO pathway analysis indicated that the collagen-containing and integrin-binding were enriched in both cohorts (adjusted p < 0.05, Fig. 6a, c). The GO circle graph from the TCGA cohort suggested that the biological functions were related to the FRGs (Fig. 3b, c).

GO and KEGG enrichment analysis.
Fig. 6  GO and KEGG enrichment analysis.

(a, c) GO enrichment analysis of the risk differential genes in TCGA and ICGC cohorts. BP represent biological process, CC represent cellular component, MF represent molecular function: and (b, d) KEGG enrichment analysis of the risk differential genes in TCGA and ICGC cohorts.

Correlation estimation of the clinical characteristics

Then, the interrelationship between the 10 genes and clinical characteristics (e.g., survival status, survival time, gender, age, tumor Gleason, grade, T, M and N stage) were assessed. We showed the expression difference of high-risk and low-risk groups in different stages (T, M and N) through heat map. In addition, the risk scores for males and HCC patients at >65 years old were elevated (Fig. 3a).

Independent prognostic analysis of the ten genes signature

To verify whether the prognostic model was independent of other clinical parameters in HCC prognosis, whether the risk score was an independent prognostic parameter for OS was assessed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that high-risk scores were significantly associated with worse OS with a higher HR (HR  =  3.606) in the TCGA (Fig. 7a) and high-risk score and HCC stage were independent risk factors for worse OS (risk score: HR  =  3.294, 95% confidence interval (CI)  =  2.294–4.730) and stage (HR  =  2.123, 95% CI  =  1.453–3.104) (Fig. 7b). Similar findings were achieved in the ICGC cohort (HR  =  3.632, 95% CI  =  1.627–8.106; Fig. 7c, d).

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of HCC patients.
Fig. 7  Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of HCC patients.

(a, b) in the TCGA cohort; and (c, d) ICGC cohort (c, d).

Analysis of immunological function

To further investigate the relationship between the HCC and prognostic and immune status, the enrichment scores for different immune cell subpopulations were adopted, which related to immune cells and immunity-related functions with ssGSEA. The frequency of antigen-presenting autologous dendritic cells (aDCs), macrophages (mø), natural killer cells (NK cells), helper T cells 2 (Th2 cells), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) differed significantly between the low and high-risk groups of HCC patients in the TGCA and ICGC cohorts (adjusted p < 0.05, Fig. 8a, c). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the levels of type II interferon (IFN) responses, major histocompatibility complex (MHC I), human leukocyte antigen (HLA), checkpoint, chemokine receptor (CCR) expression and antigen-presenting cell (APC) costimulation between the high and low-risk groups of HCC patients in the ICGC database (adjusted p < 0.05, Fig. 8b, d).

The ssGSEA scores show different risk groups in the TCGA cohort (a, b) and ICGC validation cohort (c, d).
Fig. 8  The ssGSEA scores show different risk groups in the TCGA cohort (a, b) and ICGC validation cohort (c, d).

The scores of 16 types of immune cells (a and c) and 13 immune-related functions (b and d) are shown in boxplots. Adjusted p-values were shown as: ns, not significant; * p < 0.05; ** p< 0.01; and *** p < 0.001.

Construction and evaluation of nomogram

To strengthen the model’s predictive power, a comprehensive prognostic nomogram was generated based on the patients’ risk score and clinical characteristics by integrating the metabolic risk signature, age, stage, grade, and gender (Fig. 9a). The nomogram had an excellent agreement with the ideal curve at 1-, 3-, and 5-years survival rates in the TCGA cohort (Fig. 9b–d).

Nomogram to predict the OS of HCC patients.
Fig. 9  Nomogram to predict the OS of HCC patients.

(a) prognostic nomogram for the HCC patients; the calibration curves for the nomogram at (b) 1-; (c) 3-; and (d) 5-year OS.


Currently, the incidence and mortality rates of HCC remain high, although there has been improvement in the treatment of HCC.29 Recently, immunotherapy has become a strategy for HCC patients, in addition to surgical resection and target therapies. However, the rate of HCC patients’ response to immune checkpoint inhibitors remains low. Therefore, the discovery of reliable biomarkers for evaluating the prognosis of HCC patients is urgently needed.30,31 Therefore, it is crucial to understand the pathological mechanisms of HCC development and progression.19,32

In this study, 291 DEGs were identified related to ferroptosis and HCC patient’s OS and generated a prognostic risk model with 10 DEGs after evaluating their association with the prognosis of HCC. These 10 DEGs were associated with an increased risk for worse OS in HCC patients, suggesting that they might contribute to the development and progression of HCC. Of these, SLC7A11 was of importance for the pathogenesis of HCC. The prognostic risk model was valuable to predict OS in TCGA and ICGC cohorts, because the high-risk score and HCC stage were independent risk factors for worse OS in HCC patients.33,34 Then, a nomogram was developed by combining the risk scores and clinical features. In addition, the nomogram effectively predicted the 1-, 3-, 5-year OS of HCC patients.27 Therefore, this nomogram might be valuable for the prognosis of HCC patients in the clinic.

Of interest, the 10 ferroptosis-related DEGs were associated functionally with tumorigenesis and development because they were significantly enriched in many immune-related pathways, such as lymphocyte-mediated immunity, humoral immune response, and immunoglobulin complex.24 This suggested that ferroptosis might be closely related to antitumor immunity, which agreed with a previous observation that antigen presentation-related genes were differentially expressed between the high and low-risk groups.35 It is well-known that the glutamate/cystine antiporter system Xc- is the most important target for erastin during erastin-induced ferroptosis.36 Xc- can transport cysteine (the major form of cysteine in the atmosphere) into cells.37 The inhibition of the Xc- system reduces cellular cysteine, which means that it is unavailable for the synthesis of GSH (glutathione, r-glutamyl cysteingl + glycine), which is an important antioxidant. GSH deficiency in proteins or membranes can lead to an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequent ferroptotic cell death. The combination of erastin into SLC7A5 interferes with cystine uptake by the SLC3A2/SLC7A11 complex in the trans form. The ferroptosis-related DEGs in HCC were highly enriched in the phagocytosis pathway, which suggested a close relationship between tumor induction and phagocytosis.

The prognostic model was composed of 10 FRGs (ACACA, SLC7A11, SQSTM1, SRXN1, SLC2A1, SLC38A1, MYB, ZFP69B, G6PD, STMN1). Significantly, these 10 genes were associated with a worse OS in HCC patients. ACACA is the rate-limiting enzyme of fatty acid synthetase (FAS). Inhibition of ACACA expression inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of prostate cancer LNCaP cells.38 Previous studies have shown that silencing ACACA decreases prostate cancer cell proliferation by affecting the NAD+/NADH balance. SLC7A11 is a vital subunit in the Xc-system and is crucial for ferroptosis and oxidation resistance.39 Furthermore, IFN can downregulate SLC7A11 expression in tumor cells and a combination of IFN and radiotherapy can decrease cystine transport and antioxidant storage in tumor cells, which leads to ferroptosis.40 A previous study identified different p62-positive structures in patients with HCC, steatohepatitis, and alcoholic hepatitis, such as Mallory-Denk bodies and intracellular hyaline bodies.41SRXN1 plays a vital regulatory role in the antioxidant response in eukaryotic cells. High expression of SRXN1 might lead to a poor prognosis in HCC, further reducing the overall survival rate of HCC patients.42 However, the role of SRXN1 in HCC remains unclear. SLC2A1 is a member of the solute carrier family 2 and upregulated SLC2A1 expression is significantly associated with invasiveness and late clinical stage of gastric cancer.43 High SLC38A1 expression is associated with worse survival and was an independent prognostic factor for a poor prognosis in gastric cancer.44MYB and ZFP69B are highly expressed in most tumor tissues. However, the function of MYB in HCC requires further research.45 Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) is an important metabolic enzyme in glycolysis, and it can regulate the proliferation and apoptosis of HCC.46 Increased G6PD activity promotes tumor cell growth and proliferation.47 The activity of G6PD is closely related to inflammation, infection, and the progression of the tumor and G6PD might be a therapeutic target for cancer therapies. STMN1 enhances the crosstalk between HCC and hepatic stellate cells by promoting the mesenchymal-o-epithelial transition (MET) process of HCC cells.48 Therefore, these DEGs are crucial for the development and progression of HCC and are potential therapeutic targets for interventions in HCC.

This study has several limitations. First, the prognostic model was established and validated on public databases, without validation in new samples and prospective experimental trials. In addition, the relationship between immune and risk scores was not experimentally confirmed for the prognosis of HCC.

Future directions

Ferroptosis is a new type of cell death with unique properties and recognition functions. Cell ferroptotic death could be significant for the treatment of cancer in the future. This study screened biomarkers related to the prognosis of liver cancer based on ferroptosis-related regulatory genes, to provide help for the clinical treatment of liver cancer in the future. In addition, the prognosis of liver cancer based on ferroptosis-related non-coding RNA will be studied in the future, to explore the regulatory relationship between ferroptosis-related non-coding RNA in the tumor immune microenvironment of liver cancer, and antitumor drugs will be screened to provide help for immunotherapy in liver cancer.


In total, 10 FRGs were identified that were associated with a worse OS in HCC patients. This generated model and nomogram effectively predicted the OS of HCC patients in both databases and might be valuable for the prognosis of HCC in the clinic. In the future, the potential mechanisms that underlie ferroptosis in antitumor immunity against HCC will be investigated.



area under the curve


confidence interval


differentially expressed genes


false discovery rate


ferroptosis-related genes


gene ontology


hepatocellular carcinoma


hazard ratio


International Cancer Genome Consortium


Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes




least absolute shrinkage and selection operator


liver hepatocellular carcinoma


overall survival


principal component analysis


receiver operating characteristic


single-sample gene set enrichment analysis


The Cancer Genome Atlas


t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding




Data sharing statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article.


This project was supported by the grants from Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Province (20201180; 20211223); Science and Technology Special Project of Zhanjiang (2019A01009); Basic and Applied Basic Research Program of Guangdong Province (2019A1515110201); Program of Department of Natural Resources of Guangdong Province (No. GDNRC [2020]038 and [2021]53); Discipline Construction Project of Guangdong Medical University (4SG21004G).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Authors’ contributions

Data curation (XSH and ZZ), Funding acquisition (LXL), Investigation (XSH and XLL), Project administration (LXL), Writing – original draft (LXL), Writing – review & editing (ZZ, HL and LXL).


  1. Myers SS, Smith MR, Guth S, Golden CD, Vaitla B, Mueller ND, et al. Climate change and global food systems: potential impacts on food security and undernutrition. Annu Rev Public Health 2017;38:259-277 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136(5):E359-386 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  3. Nakagawa S, Wei L, Song WM, Higashi T, Ghoshal S, Kim RS, et al. Molecular liver cancer prevention in cirrhosis by organ transcriptome analysis and lysophosphatidic acid pathway inhibition. Cancer Cell 2016;30(6):879-890 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  4. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 29 cancer groups, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 2019;5(12):1749-1768 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  5. Gao X, Ji FP. Diagnosis and treatment strategies of hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of direct-acting antiviral drugs. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi 2020;28(10):827-830 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  6. Giannini EG, Farinati F, Ciccarese F, Pecorelli A, Rapaccini GL, Di Marco M, et al. Prognosis of untreated hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2015;61(1):184-190 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  7. Li J, Cao F, Yin HL, Huang ZJ, Lin ZT, Mao N, et al. Ferroptosis: past, present and future. Cell Death Dis 2020;11(2):88 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  8. Mou Y, Wang J, Wu J, He D, Zhang C, Duan C, et al. Ferroptosis, a new form of cell death: opportunities and challenges in cancer. J Hematol Oncol 2019;12(1):34 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  9. Gao M, Monian P, Pan Q, Zhang W, Xiang J, Jiang X. Ferroptosis is an autophagic cell death process. Cell Res 2016;26(9):1021-1032 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  10. Hou W, Xie Y, Song X, Sun X, Lotze MT, Zeh HJ, et al. Autophagy promotes ferroptosis by degradation of ferritin. Autophagy 2016;12(8):1425-1428 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  11. Gao M, Yi J, Zhu J, Minikes AM, Monian P, Thompson CB, et al. Role of Mitochondria in Ferroptosis. Mol Cell 2019;73(2):354-363.e3 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  12. Shrestha R, Prithviraj P, Anaka M, Bridle KR, Crawford DHG, Dhungel B, et al. Monitoring Immune Checkpoint Regulators as Predictive Biomarkers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2018;8:269 View Article
  13. Liu X, Qin S. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma: opportunities and challenges. Oncologist 2019;24(Suppl 1):S3-S10 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  14. Sangro B, Chan SL, Meyer T, Reig M, El-Khoueiry A, Galle PR. Diagnosis and management of toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2020;72(2):320-341 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  15. Choi C, Yoo GS, Cho WK, Park HC. Optimizing radiotherapy with immune checkpoint blockade in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2019;25(20):2416-2429 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  16. Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43(7):e47 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  17. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010;26(1):139-140 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  18. McEligot AJ, Poynor V, Sharma R, Panangadan A. Logistic LASSO regression for dietary intakes and breast cancer. Nutrients 2020;12(9):2652 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  19. Du X, Zhang Y. Integrated analysis of immunity- and ferroptosis-related biomarker signatures to improve the prognosis prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Genet 2020;11:614888 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  20. Cho YA, Lee J, Oh JH, Chang HJ, Sohn DK, Shin A, et al. Genetic risk score, combined lifestyle factors and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2019;51(3):1033-1040 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  21. Kamarudin AN, Cox T, Kolamunnage-Dona R. Time-dependent ROC curve analysis in medical research: current methods and applications. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017;17(1):53 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  22. Wang Z, Gao L, Guo X, Feng C, Lian W, Deng K, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram with an autophagy-related gene signature for predicting survival in patients with glioblastoma. Aging (Albany NY) 2019;11(24):12246-12269 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  23. Aliverti E, Tilson JL, Filer DL, Babcock B, Colaneri A, Ocasio J, et al. Projected t-SNE for batch correction. Bioinformatics 2020;36(11):3522-3527 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  24. Chen L, Zhang YH, Wang S, Zhang Y, Huang T, Cai YD. Prediction and analysis of essential genes using the enrichment of gene ontology and KEGG pathways. PLoS One 2017;12(9):e0184129 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  25. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol 2010;11(2):R14 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  26. Yi M, Nissley DV, McCormick F, Stephens RM. ssGSEA score-based Ras dependency indexes derived from gene expression data reveal potential Ras addiction mechanisms with possible clinical implications. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):10258 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  27. Wang S, Yang L, Ci B, Maclean M, Gerber DE, Xiao G, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram prognostic model for SCLC patients. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13(9):1338-1348 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  28. Hu C, Yang J, Huang Z, Liu C, Lin Y, Tong Y, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic nomograms for bone metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2020;20(1):494 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  29. Ichikawa T, Sano K, Morisaka H. Diagnosis of pathologically early HCC with EOB-MRI: experiences and current consensus. Liver Cancer 2014;3(2):97-107 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  30. Kim DW, Talati C, Kim R. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): beyond sorafenib-chemotherapy. J Gastrointest Oncol 2017;8(2):256-265 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  31. Liang JY, Wang DS, Lin HC, Chen XX, Yang H, Zheng Y, et al. A novel ferroptosis-related gene signature for overall survival prediction in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Biol Sci 2020;16(13):2430-2441 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  32. Yu Z, He H, Chen Y, Ji Q, Sun M. A novel ferroptosis related gene signature is associated with prognosis in patients with ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma. Sci Rep 2021;11(1):11486 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  33. Zhuo S, Chen Z, Yang Y, Zhang J, Tang J, Yang K. Clinical and biological significances of a ferroptosis-related gene signature in glioma. Front Oncol 2020;10:590861 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  34. Wang S, Wu C, Ma D, Hu Q. Identification of a ferroptosis-related gene signature (FRGS) for predicting clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma. PeerJ 2021;9:e11233 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  35. Wu ZH, Tang Y, Zhou Y. A metabolic gene signature to predict overall survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mediators Inflamm 2020;2020:6716908 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  36. Xu T, Ding W, Ji X, Ao X, Liu Y, Yu W, et al. Molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis and its role in cancer therapy. J Cell Mol Med 2019;23(8):4900-4912 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  37. Lu B, Chen XB, Ying MD, He QJ, Cao J, Yang B. The role of ferroptosis in cancer development and treatment response. Front Pharmacol 2018;8:992 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  38. Zhang H, Liu S, Cai Z, Dong W, Ye J, Cai Z, et al. Down-regulation of ACACA suppresses the malignant progression of Prostate Cancer through inhibiting mitochondrial potential. J Cancer 2021;12(1):232-243 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  39. Lin W, Wang C, Liu G, Bi C, Wang X, Zhou Q, et al. SLC7A11/xCT in cancer: biological functions and therapeutic implications. Am J Cancer Res 2020;10(10):3106-3126 PubMed/NCBI
  40. Lang X, Green MD, Wang W, Yu J, Choi JE, Jiang L, et al. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy promote tumoral lipid oxidation and ferroptosis via synergistic repression of SLC7A11. Cancer Discov 2019;9(12):1673-1685 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  41. Sánchez-Martín P, Saito T, Komatsu M. p62/SQSTM1: ‘Jack of all trades’ in health and cancer. FEBS J 2019;286(1):8-23 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  42. Lv X, Yu H, Zhang Q, Huang Q, Hong X, Yu T, et al. SRXN1 stimulates hepatocellular carcinoma tumorigenesis and metastasis through modulating ROS/p65/BTG2 signalling. J Cell Mol Med 2020;24(18):10714-10729 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  43. Yan S, Wang Y, Chen M, Li G, Fan J. Deregulated SLC2A1 promotes tumor cell proliferation and metastasis in gastric cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2015;16(7):16144-16157 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  44. Xie J, Li P, Gao HF, Qian JX, Yuan LY, Wang JJ. Overexpression of SLC38A1 is associated with poorer prognosis in Chinese patients with gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;14:70 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  45. Pu X, Yang L, Liu L, Dong X, Chen S, Chen Z, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the MYB transcription factor superfamily in Physcomitrella patens. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21(3):975 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  46. Swastika M, Harahap AR, Panggalo LV, Jusman SWA, Satyagraha AW. Determining a critical threshold for G6PD activity below which red blood cell response to oxidative stress is poor. Malar J 2020;19(1):208 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  47. Yang HC, Wu YH, Yen WC, Liu HY, Hwang TL, Stern A, et al. The redox role of G6PD in cell growth, cell death, and cancer. Cells 2019;8(9):1055 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  48. Zhang R, Gao X, Zuo J, Hu B, Yang J, Zhao J, et al. STMN1 upregulation mediates hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic stellate cell crosstalk to aggravate cancer by triggering the MET pathway. Cancer Sci 2020;111(2):406-417 View Article PubMed/NCBI
  • Journal of Exploratory Research in Pharmacology
  • eISSN 2572-5505

Ferroptosis-related Gene Model and Nomogram Predict the Prognosis and Immune Microenvironment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Xue-Shan Huang, Zheng Zhu, Xiao-Ling Li, Hui Luo, Lian-Xiang Luo
  • Reset Zoom
  • Download TIFF