Publications > Journals > Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology > Article Full Text

  • OPEN ACCESS

A Review of Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis C Virus Immunopathogenesis

  • Corey Saraceni* and
  • John Birk 
 Author information
Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology 2021;():-

DOI: 10.14218/JCTH.2020.00095

Abstract

Despite the advances in therapy, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) still represent a significant global health burden, both as major causes of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and death worldwide. HBV is capable of incorporating its covalently closed circular DNA into the host cell’s hepatocyte genome, making it rather difficult to eradicate its chronic stage. Successful viral clearance depends on the complex interactions between the virus and host’s innate and adaptive immune response. One encouraging fact on hepatitis B is the development and effective distribution of the HBV vaccine. This has significantly reduced the spread of this virus. HCV is a RNA virus with high mutagenic capacity, thus enabling it to evade the immune system and have a high rate of chronic progression. High levels of HCV heterogeneity and its mutagenic capacity have made it difficult to create an effective vaccine. The recent advent of direct acting antivirals has ushered in a new era in hepatitis C therapy. Sustained virologic response is achieved with DAAs in 85–99% of cases. However, this still leads to a large population of treatment failures, so further advances in therapy are still needed. This article reviews the immunopathogenesis of HBV and HCV, their properties contributing to host immune system avoidance, chronic disease progression, vaccine efficacy and limitations, as well as treatment options and common pitfalls of said therapy.

Keywords

Hepatitis B immunopathogenesis, Hepatitis C immunopathogenesis

Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections remain major global health issues. Although the two viruses directly infect the liver, they have very different courses. Worldwide, there are an estimated more than 250 million HBV carriers, of whom roughly 600,000 die annually from HBV-related liver disease.1,2 Acute HBV infection in adults is normally self-limited and subclinical, resulting in chronic infection in about 5%, as compared to neonatal HBV infection, where the acute infection results in chronic infection in 90% of cases. As a DNA virus, it is capable of incorporating its covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) into the host cell’s genome, making it rather difficult to eradicate once the infection progresses to the chronic stage.

HCV was first identified in 1989 as a major cause of non A or B viral hepatitis.3,4 Approximately 100 million people around the world have serologic evidence of HCV exposure and 71 million have chronic hepatitis C infection, according to a 2015 World Health Organization study.5 It is estimated that 60–80% of patients with acute HCV infection will develop chronic infection, with about 20% of these chronically-infected HCV patients developing cirrhosis over a 25 year period. Those with cirrhosis have a yearly incidence of HCC of about 4–5%.6,7 HCV is an inconstant RNA virus with high mutagenic capacity, and this leads to frequent genome mutations that enable it to evade the immune system and thereby have a high rate of chronic progression.8 Furthermore, due to this high level of HCV heterogeneity, it has been difficult to create an effective vaccine.

Understanding the immunopathogenesis of HBV and HCV is essential in determining disease progression, chronicity, and treatment. The purpose of this article was to review the factors associated with HBV and HCV immunopathogenesis, disease progression, and pitfalls of current treatment options (Table 1).

Table 1

HBV and HCV immunopathogeneses

Hepatitis BHepatitis C
Virus structurercDNAssRNA
Receptor entryHepatocyte-specific NTCP receptor: Bile acid uptake from portal bloodMulti-step entry mechanism: LDL-R, SR-BI, CD-81, CLDN1, OCLN, NPC1L
Chronic progressionAdult infection: Clearance: 95%, Chronic progression: 5%
Neonatal vertical transmission: Clearance: 10%, Chronic progression: 90%
All patients: Clearance: 60–80%, Chronic progression: 20–40%
Mechanisms of immune evasionCD4+ cell inhibiting factors: IL-10, TNF-B
CD8+ cell inhibiting factors: PD-1, CD244, CTLA-4
CD4+ cell inhibiting factors (including Tregs): IL-10, TNF-B, Overall Reduced CD4+ response
CD8+ cell escape mutations: PD-1, CTLA-4
Approved therapiesInterferon therapy: Standard INF-α, Pegylated-IFN-α
NAs
Treatment initiation decision: Presence of cirrhosis, ALT level, HBV DNA level
Interferon therapy: Pegylated-IFN-α + ribavirin
DAAs
Treatment selection varies by: Genotype, presence of cirrhosis, treatment history, human immunodeficiency virus co-infection, renal impairment
Goals of therapyAttain disease suppression: Suppression of HBV DNA, Loss of HBeAg, Normalization of ALT, Decrease necroinflammatory activity, Decrease in fibrosisEradicate HCV RNA – attain SVR: Undetectable RNA level 12 wk after completion of therapy
VaccinesApproved and effective vaccines: Plasma-derived vaccination, HBV three-series vaccineNo available effective vaccines

Hepatitis B

Background

HBV is an enveloped DNA virus from the Hepadnaviridae family. The virus particle consists of an exterior envelope surrounding a viral capsid containing relaxed circular DNA (rcDNA). When the virus infects hepatocytes, it leaves a stable cccDNA template within the cell’s nucleus. This provides a stable, long-lasting template for viral replication and accounts for HBV’s viral persistence. HBV hepatocyte infection can be divided into the following steps: cell entry, capsid uncoating, DNA repair and transcription, RNA packaging, reverse transcription, enveloping, and virus secretion (Fig. 1).

Hepatitis B viral life cycle.
Fig. 1  Hepatitis B viral life cycle.

Viral entry into the hepatocyte is mediated by hepatocyte-binding specific envelope proteins. The HBV viral surface contains three proteins: L, M, and S. The virus binds and uses the hepatocyte-specific sodium taurocholate cotransport polypeptide (NTCP) receptor, which is involved in bile acid uptake from portal blood flow for hepatocyte cell entry. In a seminal article by Yan et al.,9,10 (2012), the pre-S1 domain of the HBV envelope L protein was described to bind to the hepatocyte-specific NTCP receptor, leading to cell binding and entry. The antigenic loop of HBV surface protein S between regions I and II interact with hepatocyte heparin sulfate proteoglycans and aid in HBV-NTCP receptor interaction and HBV infectivity (Fig. 2).11

Hepatitis B DNA integration.
Fig. 2  Hepatitis B DNA integration.

1) HBV pre-S1 domain of envelope L protein binds to the hepatocyte-specific NTCP receptor (involved in bile acid uptake from portal blood flow), leading to cell entry.9,10 The antigenic loop of HBV surface protein S between regions I and II interact with hepatocyte heparin sulfate proteoglycans and aid in HBV-NTCP receptor interaction.11 2) The viral nucleocapsid containing rcDNA is transported to the nucleus where it is “repaired” by the host cell’s DNA repair mechanisms closing or “derelaxing” the rcDNA to form cccDNA. The cccDNA remains permanently in the hepatocyte’s nucleus and acts as a template for viral mRNA and pgRNA.12,13 3) Viral mRNA and pgRNA are transported to the cytoplasm. Here, mRNA undergoes translation by host ribosomes to form viral proteins. The viral proteins and pgRNA are then assembled and encapsulated. pgRNA undergoes reverse transcription by newly transcribed HBV reverse transcriptase, producing a (−)DNA intermediate. pgRNA is then degraded and HBV reverse transcriptase completes transcription, producing an rcDNA containing nucleocapsid. 4) rcDNA containing nucleocapsids can either a) be enveloped and secreted as virions or b) cycle back to the nucleus to replenish the cccDNA pool.117 5) Transcription of pgRNA by HBV reverse transcriptase in a 3′ to 5′ direction resulting in a (−)DNA. pgRNA is then partially hydrolyzed by HBV reverse transcriptase, leaving an 18 nucleotide RNA primer for synthesis of (+)DNA strand. In ∼90% of nucleocapsids, the RNA primer translocates to DR2 resulting in rcDNA as HBV reverse transcriptase synthesizes the (+)DNA resulting in an rcDNA containing nucleocapsid. In ∼10% of pgRNA containing nucleocapsids, priming for reverse transcription occurs at the DR1 region (instead of DR2 region) of the (−)DNA template with resulting in dslDNA. 6) Viral dslDNA can then be transported to the nucleus and can incorporate into host DNA at double-strand DNA breaks.27

Following binding and entry into the hepatocyte, the viral nucleocapsid containing rcDNA is released into the cytoplasm and transported to the cell’s nucleus, where the rcDNA is delivered. In the nucleus, the rcDNA is “repaired” by the host cell’s DNA repair mechanisms, closing or de-relaxing the rcDNA to form cccDNA. This cccDNA remains permanently in the hepatocyte’s nucleus and acts as a template for viral RNA transcription. The RNA transcripts are transported into the hepatocytes cytoplasm, where HBV reverse transcriptase uses the RNA as templates to produce viral rcDNA. The rcDNA is then either repackaged and enveloped for cellular export or recycled back to the nucleus, amplifying cccDNA concentration.12,13

Acute hepatitis b infection

Acute hepatitis B (AHB) infection occurs by the exchange of bodily fluids such as blood, semen, or vaginal fluid. About 70% of adults who are acutely infected have a subclinical and anicteric phase, while the other 30% develop clinically significant symptoms and icteric hepatitis. Studies in chimpanzees by Wieland et al.,14 (2004) and transgenic mice studies by Baron et al.,15 (2002) have demonstrated the immune response during HBV infection. In an acute infection, HBV has a prolonged incubation period of 45–180 days. The initial immune response is mediated by the innate immune system. Typically, the innate immune response results in about a 90% reduction in serum HBV DNA. In the chimpanzee and other model systems, it has been shown that natural killer (NK) cells and natural killer T (NKT) cells play an important role in the early viral control of acute HBV infection through interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) secretion. A surge of IFN-γ mediated by NK cells, NKT cells, and T cells has been found to coincide with a reduction in serum HBV DNA.14 Subsequent ex vivo studies have shown that IFN-γ and TNF-α stimulation could destabilize cccDNA via activation of APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B.16 These studies also suggested that the innate immune response is important for rapid viral clearance during AHB infection, although they cannot clear the virus alone.

The adaptive immune response during an acute infection function is crucial in three ways: 1) inhibition of HBV attachment and entry, 2) eradication of infected hepatocytes, and 3) conference of viral immunity. B cell response and antibody production is focused on the various HBV proteins, including core protein, surface protein, e-antigen, and polymerase. The antibodies specific for the envelope (hepatitis B surface antibody, known as anti-HBs or HBsAb) and nucleocapsid antigen (hepatitis B core antibody, known as anti-HBc or HBcAb) are both clinically important and useful to distinguish between different acute phases of HBV infection.17 The discovery of the NTCP and pre-S1on protein L and the antigenic loop on protein S contributing to hepatocyte infection has led to the understanding of how anti-HBs leads to disease resolution and virus control. Antibodies against these entry antigens effectively block HBV infection, contributing to disease resolution and long-term immunity.18,19

HBV-specific T lymphocytes are responsible for viral clearance as well as halting liver inflammation. HBV specific CD8+ T cells are found in the liver during acute HBV infection and cause lysis of HBV-infected hepatocytes. This is thought to be the mechanism of clearing cccDNA-containing hepatocytes and effectively eliminating HBV infection.20 CD8+ T cells have also been shown to release INF-γ and TNF-α during acute HBV infection, stimulating the innate immune response, a key mechanism in serum HBV DNA clearance.21 T cell response is modulated during an acute infection by both inhibitory and activating regulatory mechanisms, including expression of PD-1, IL-10, and CD4 T regulatory cells (Tregs).22 Higher expression of T cell inhibitory mechanisms (i.e. PD-1, CD244, and CTLA-4) are seen in patients who develop chronic hepatitis B (CHB), indicating that inhibition of the T cell response may contribute to development of CHB.2325

CHB

CHB is characterized by both persistent liver inflammation and HBV infection. Liver inflammation leading to fibrosis and cirrhosis occurs due to chronic inflammation as the immune system destroys the cccDNA-containing hepatocytes but is unable to clear the HBV infection. Clinically, this is identified by the presence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), elevated HBV DNA, with elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). CHB can be further subdivided into two types: HBV e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative. HBeAg is an immunologically distinct soluble antigen, located between the viral nucleocapsid and envelope processed from the pre-core protein. Loss of HBeAg is typically associated with remission of liver disease; however, in a subset of HBeAg-negative patients, viral reactivation can occur. The phases of HBV infection are detailed below.

The course of HBV infection can be divided into four phases that are determined by the host-virus immune response. The first phase is the immune tolerance phase, characterized by active replication of HBV without substantial hepatic inflammation but with HBeAg positivity and normal ALT level. HBeAg accumulates in the serum as an immunologically distinct soluble antigen and is used as a marker of active viral replication. The function of HBeAg is not clearly understood and is dispensable for replication, as mutant viruses without HBeAg exist and are both infectious and pathogenic. The second phase is the immune clearance phase, characterized by elevated ALT levels and decreased HBV DNA load. The third phase is the inactive carrier state, known as the immune control phase, defined by low HBV replication in which HBeAg positive patients lose HBeAg and gain antibodies to HBeAg (HBeAb). This phase is characterized by disease remission. The fourth phase is viral relapse, known as the immune escape phase, and is associated with a relatively high rate of liver inflammation, fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development, and mortality. In this phase, patients who were inactive carriers develop increased viral replication of HBeAg-negative HBV and hepatic inflammation with elevated ALT. This phase transition may occur in 20–30% of patients in the inactive carrier phase. HBeAg-negative CHB is the main form of CHB worldwide and is associated with defective T cell function.26 It remains unclear what triggers the progression through the various phases of infection or the mechanism of defective T cell function during the immune escape.

Dysregulation of T cell immune response has been associated with progression to CHB. CD4+ helper T cells perform antiviral functions and produce a variety of cytokines crucial for viral clearance and progression to fibrosis, specifically the ratio between Tregs and Th17 T-helper cell subtypes. These two subtypes remain antagonistic to each other, where Th17 cells mediate inflammatory response leading to liver damage and fibrosis while Tregs mediate immune tolerance and contribute to the chronicity of infection. Nan et al.,27 (2012) found elevated levels of both Tregs and Th17 cells in peripheral blood in patients with HBV infection; however, Th17 cells were significantly higher in patients with AHB compared to patients with CHB, who showed a higher Treg/Th17 ratio. These findings suggest Treg/Th17 imbalance is closely associated with progression of CHB. Further studies have shown higher interleukin (IL)-35, which stimulates Treg production, in CHB patients, contributing to the dysregulation of the Treg/Th17 ratio and that higher Treg/Th17 ratios are closely associated with cirrhosis.28,29 CD4+ helper T cells play an important role in stimulating and maintaining CD8+ T cell response, and insufficient CD4+ helper T cell response is strongly associated with impairment of CD8+ T cell function and viral persistence.

Sterilizing cure is defined as the eradication of intrahepatic HBV DNA (intranuclear cccDNA or integrated HBV DNA), loss of HBsAg, and undetectable serum HBV DNA. This was the goal of interferon (IFN)-based therapies. Once viral DNA is incorporated into the host genome or cccDNA in the host nucleus, it is a challenge to remove it and may require immune modulation to destroy the infected hepatocyte due to the dysregulation of T cell immune response. Luneman et al.,30 (2014) discovered that CHB patients paradoxically produce CD56bright NK cells that inhibit cytokine production and blunt the cytolytic activity of CD8+ T-cells. Studies have shown that interferon-alpha (IFN-α) treatment induces normal CD56bright NK cell activity, thereby increasing IFN-γ expression and cytotoxic function of CD8+ T cells with an associated decline viral load.31,32 In a study by Wursthorn et al.,33 (2006) IFN therapy can decrease intrahepatic HBV DNA in most patients and achieve undetectable levels on about 50% of patients based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of post-treatment liver biopsies. Although IFN-α therapy may lead to seroconversion and viral clearance, there is a poor response rate, with about a 30% HBeAg seroconversion and 3% HBsAg seroconversion.26 Due to the side effect profile, and the mediocre sterilizing cure rate, IFN-based therapies have fallen out of use. Functional cure, defined by seroclearance of HBsAg with persistence of HBV DNA only in the liver, is associated with improved clinical outcomes and is the current therapeutic target. Functional cure is the goal of nucleus(t)ide analogues (NAs) and is achieved by inhibiting viral replication. Due to the persistence of cccDNA in hepatocytes, NAs must be administered long term, if not indefinitely. However, some studies have shown that NA treatment improves CD8+ T cell cytotoxic function and occasionally clearance of HBV DNA-containing hepatocytes is achieved.34,35 In a subset of patients, cure can occur after prolonged NA treatment.

HBV vaccines and limitations

HBV vaccination has been an effective measure to prevent HBV infection. Plasma-derived vaccinations were first developed then replaced by recombinant HBV vaccines in the 1980’s, both with similar efficacy.36 These vaccines stimulate anti-HBs antibodies in noninfected individuals, with a 95% effective rate of seroconversion. The reason for 5% non-response remains unclear; however, there are certain populations affected, including those with chronic disease, certain genetic mutations, and those on immunomodulatory medications at higher risk for non-response to vaccination.37 Chronic diseases include old age (>60 years-old), human immunodeficiency virus-coinfection, and chronic kidney disease. Genetic mutations associated with non-response include homozygous mutations for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DRB1*0301, HLA-B8, SC01, DR-3, HLAB44, FC-31, and DR-7.38,39 Methods that induce seroconversion include administering a 4th dose of vaccine or a repeat administration of the three-series vaccine at a higher dose. Other vaccine methods currently under investigation include intradermal administration of the vaccine, the use of adjuvants (including 3-deacylatedmonophosphoryl lipid A), use of triple S antigen recombinants, and a vaccine with the combination HBsAg and HBcAg.37

The implementation of a rigorous vaccination program worldwide has led to a decrease in incidence of hepatitis B infection. However, the widespread use of vaccines has led to the emergence of certain point escape mutations leading to vaccination failure. This phenomenon has been shown to cause hepatitis B infection in previously vaccinated patients. A prospective Chinese study showed 6/176 adults to be HBV DNA-positive by PCR at 1 year after receiving the HBV vaccine. Four out of these six cases had known HBV escape mutations.40 Despite awareness of this emerging issue, there is no consensus currently on the need for vaccine redevelopment or need for therapy in individuals infected with these mutants.41

Experimental treatments in the pipeline

Currently, there are many classes of medications with various targets under investigation for hepatitis B therapy. One class under investigation are entry inhibitors targeting NTCP and therefore protecting against de novo infection of hepatocytes.42 Myrcludex-B has been shown safe and effective in HBV/hepatitis D virus coinfection and is in phase II trials for the treatment of chronic HBV.43 Another class undergoing active investigation includes small interfering RNAs, which target viral RNA and lead to their degradation preventing translation of viral proteins crucial for viral capsid formation and cccDNA formation.44 Multiple small interfering RNA candidates are currently in phase I/II trials.45 Capsid inhibitors are another class of drugs currently under investigation. The integrity of viral capsids, the protein surrounding the viral genome, are physically altered, causing both disruption of capsid integrity and preventing hepatocyte entry, thereby preventing cccDNA formation. This mechanism is distinct from entry inhibitors, as capsid inhibitors also exhibit antiviral properties.46 Another class of agents, HBsAg inhibitors, which are currently in phase II trials, work by inhibiting the processing of HBsAg and release from the infected cell. Interestingly, they also seem to trigger an antiviral immune response, as serum HBsAg titer falls and occasionally HBsAb seroconversion occurs after monotherapy use.47 This antiviral effect suggests that viral surface proteins in circulation may contribute to impairment of the immune system’s antiviral response.47 The role of HBsAg on antiviral suppression remains unclear and is an intriguing area of study in understanding the progression to chronic HBV and potential future immunomodulating therapies.

Investigational therapies using vaccines to stimulate cytotoxic T cell response have yielded unsatisfactory results. Fontaine et al.,48 (2015) performed a phase I/II trial using NAs alongside an HBV envelope expressing DNA vaccine. The trial showed no benefit in regard to risk of relapse of HBV treated patients, rate of virologic breakthrough, or restoration of anti-HBV immune response. Lok et al.,49 (2016) performed a phase II trial using T cell-based vaccine after 1 year of therapy with NAs. The vaccine did not provide significant reductions in HBsAg in virally suppressed patients with CHB. Currently, PD-1 inhibitors are being studied to explore if durable control of CHB can be achieved. Phase 1 trials have shown that in virally suppressed HBeAg-negative patients, that nivolumab (PD-1 inhibitor) led to HBsAg decline in most patients and sustained HBsAg loss in one patient.50 Clinical trials are currently ongoing, studying various vaccines and immunomodulatory to achieve sustained CHB control.51

Hepatitis C

Background

HCV was isolated in 1989 and is a member of the Flaviviridae family (which includes Dengue and Zika virus). HCV has infected nearly 3% of the world’s population. It is a major cause of liver disease and cancer, where about 30% of chronically infected individuals develop cirrhosis, and infected individuals are at a 17-fold increased risk of developing HCC. In the USA, HCV accounts for 50% of the cases of HCC.52 The virus consists of a single lipid bilayer envelope surrounding a viral nucleocapsid, containing multiple viral core proteins and single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) that encodes for a single large polyprotein transcript. The single transcript is further processed into three structural proteins (core, envelope-1, envelop-2) and seven proteins involved in viral replication. In chronic HCV infection, the actions of the virus along with host immune factors cause dysregulation of the immune system, leading to failure of the immune response to clear the HCV infection. The inability of the immune system to clear the infection leads to persistent hepatic inflammation, itself leading to cirrhosis, liver failure, or the development of HCC. The virus’s high mutation rate due to the lack of proofreading capability by its RNA-dependent RNA polymerase leads to escape mutations, allowing the virus to evade the immune system and contributes to treatment and vaccine failure.

This high mutation rate leads to a broad range of genetic variants categorized into seven main genotypes, each with multiple different subtypes. Each genotype has more than a 25–35% difference in their nucleotide sequence.53 Genotype subtypes differ in nucleotide sequence from each other by 15–25%.54 Further genetic variability can be found in each individual patient, where multiple viral quasispecies containing different mutations can co-exist. Prevalence of distribution of HCV genotypes varies geographically. Among all the genotypes, genotype 1 (i.e. HCV-1) is the most prevalent worldwide. In the USA, HCV-1a and HCV-1b subtypes account for 60–70% of all patients. HCV-2 is the most prevalent in middle and west Africa, HCV-3 in east Asia and India, HCV-4 in Egypt and sub-Saharan Africa, HCV-5 in South Africa, HCV-6 in China and southwest Asia, and HCV-7 in central Africa.53,55

HCV infection

HCV circulates in the blood, accessing basolateral hepatocyte surface receptors. The HCV particle has a very low density that closely resembles very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) and uses apolipoprotein and serum lipid uptake mechanisms to enter the hepatocyte. HCV entry is complex and uses multiple cell entry factors that are spatially arranged and bind in a temporally ordered manner. Five cell surface proteins are essential for HCV particle binding and entry, namely CD81, scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI), claudin 1 (CLDN1), occludin (OCLN) and Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 cholesterol absorption receptor (NPC1L1). First, HCV attaches to the hepatocyte LDL-R via viral apolipoprotein E-like protein.56 Next, SR-BI surface protein binds to viral lipoproteins expressed by HCV surface E2 gene. SR-BI is involved in high density lipoprotein (HDL) and VLDL binding and is highly expressed by hepatocytes, which may explain HCV hepatotropism. SR-BI then serves to unmask virus particles and exposes the CD81 cell membrane protein which binds to HCV E2 surface protein.57 The CD81-HCV complex moves laterally across the cell membrane to tight junctions, where CLDN1 is located, and activates CLDN1 mediated viral entry via clathrin-dependent endocytosis.58 OCLN and NPC1L1 are tight junction proteins that are involved with HCV entry, however their exact roles are unknown. Targeting NPC1L1 with antibodies or its antagonist ezetimibe (already Food and Drug Administration-approved as a cholesterol lowering medication) has been shown to halt or delay cell entry of all seven HCV genotypes, providing an intriguing potential therapeutic target.59

The HCV assembly and release processes is not yet fully understood; however, it seems to be closely related to lipid packaging and release.60 Once inside the cell, the virus particles are uncoated, the capsid is destroyed, and the viral positive sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) is released into the cytoplasm.61 The viral RNA then takes over the hepatocytes ribosome on the rough endoplasmic reticulum to synthesize a single long polyprotein that is later proteolytically processed by viral and cellular proteases into its 10 proteins, which include 3 structural proteins (core, E1, E2) and 7 nonstructural proteins (p7, NS2, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, NS5B).61 Here in the cytoplasm, newly formed HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase transcribes the viral +ssRNA into an intermediate negative sense single stranded RNA (-ssRNA), which is then later transcribed into +ssRNA. The newly transcribed +ssRNA is then either packaged into new HCV virions or used for further HCV polyprotein translation by endoplasmic reticulum ribosomes. It is during this process, due to the high error rate and lack of proofreading ability of the HCV RNA polymerase, that many mutations are introduced and the many HCV quasispecies are formed.61 The error rate of HCV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is estimated to be between one mutation per every 103–106 nucleotides copied compared to one mutation per every 108–1011 nucleotides copied for DNA polymerases.6264 The virus proteins then arrange on the endoplasmic reticulum intracellular lipid membrane, where core proteins are shaped and bind to cytosolic lipid droplets (cLDs).65 The cLD-bound core proteins assemble into the core nucleocapsid via microtubules and dyneins, and +ssRNA are encapsulated. The HCV nucleocapsids, containing RNA and core proteins, then bud into the endoplasmic reticulum, where surface proteins are attached.

The detailed mechanism of HCV viral release is yet unknown; however, hepatocyte exit seems to depend on the pathway for producing VLDLs and on the presence of apolipoprotein B and E. It is thought that the HCV particle complexes with apolipoprotein B and apolipoprotein E containing VLDLs in order to exit the hepatocyte. A study by Huang et al.,66 (2007) showed that blocking VLDL secretion reduced HCV viral release from the hepatocytes in a growth media by 80%. Recently, another cellular pathway has been implicated in HCV release. The endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) pathway has been implicated in HCV secretion out of the endoplasmic reticulum and cell. This pathway is normally used to bud vesicles out of the cell, and HCV may use the ESCRT system too, but little is known about this process.67

Innate immune response to hepatitis C infection

The innate immune response is important in HCV infection by both limiting viral dissemination through inducing infected hepatocyte apoptosis and stimulating the antigen specific adaptive immune response.68 During an acute HCV infection, viral RNA is detected within the hepatocyte cytoplasm. The presence of intracellular HCV RNA after the uncoating of HCV virion activates TLR3, RIG-I, and MDA5 of infected hepatocytes, which in turn release interferon 1 (IFN-I, a and b) and IFN-γ. Circulating HCV RNA is also detected by plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs). The activated pDCs produce IFN-α. Both IFN-I (a and b) and IFN-γ released by infected hepatocytes and circulating pDCs act to directly inhibit HCV replication and activate NK cells.69 NK cells play a crucial role in the innate immune response to acute HCV infection by cytolytic destruction of infected hepatocytes and cytokine release, which both directly inhibit HCV replication and stimulate the adaptive immune response. Activated NK cells directly induce infected hepatocyte perforin- and granzyme B-mediated apoptosis. The cytolytic action of NK cells through the perforin/granzyme mechanism causes collateral damage to uninfected surrounding hepatocytes. NK cells also produce IFN-γ and TNF-α, which cause dendritic cell maturation, leading to IL-12 release which induces the adaptive immune response with the differentiation of CD4 and CD8 T cells.70,71 Lastly, in vitro studies have shown that IFN produced by NK cells directly inhibits HCV replication.72

Adaptive immune response, its shortcomings, and progression to chronic hepatitis C

Generally, T cell response is the adaptive immune system’s main mechanism of viremia control. In HCV, specific CD8+ T cells destroy infected hepatocytes via HLA class I antigen presenting cells as well as by inducing cytokine secretion (TNF-α, IFN-γ).73 Helper CD4+ T cells support this function via IL-2 to stimulate CD8+ T cell and NK cell activation.74,75

Chronic HCV infection is defined as persistent viremia for more than 6 months.76 In chronic HCV, a continuous yet impaired activation of the adaptive immune system occurs. HCV has multiple mechanisms to defend against immune clearance, resulting in immune system evasion and chronic infection.

The first major mechanism of chronic infection is the loss of T cell function due to chronic T cell activation. Essentially, T cell function is inhibited and their cytotoxic capacity is lost. First described in persistently-infected mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), high levels of persistent viral antigen production results in chronic T cell activation, leading to sequential loss of T cell function.77 During chronic infection, HCV specific CD4+ helper T cells show a reduced production of IL-2, resulting in impaired CD8+ T cells activation.78 Additionally, HCV core antibody has been implicated in T cell suppression, as it binds to complement C1q inhibiting Lck/Akt activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.79 PD-1-mediated CD8+ T cell suppression has also been implicated in inhibiting T cells. Studies have shown that isolating CD8+ T cells from chronically infected patients and exposing the cells to PD-1 blocking drugs in vitro can restore T cell function.80,81 Further studies have shown that CTLA4 (an inhibitory signal produced by Tregs) along with PD-1 may synergistically inhibit CD8+ T cell function.82

CD4+ T cell activity plays an important role in chronic HCV infection. It is widely known that a vigorous CD4+ T cell response during an acute HCV infection is correlated with viral clearance.8385 Conversely, progression of acute HCV infection to chronic infection is strongly associated with the downfall of HCV specific CD4+ T cell response.74,83 Both the lack of robust CD4+ T cell response during acute infection and the decrease CD4+ T cell response after the acute phase of infection have both been observed and associated with the development of chronic progression.86 The mechanism by which CD4+ T cell response dwindles during the acute infection remains unclear. One mechanism proposed is HCV escape mutations occurring in patients with various HLA epitopes (including HLA-DRB1*15 epitope).86,87

Other Tregs, such as CD25+ T cells, play a role in suppressing immune system activation.8890 These cells work through various mechanisms to suppress the immune response during chronic HCV infection, including CD8+ T cell inhibition and inhibition of cytokine release such as IL-10 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) immunomodulating cytokines.89,91,92 Tregs upregulated during chronic infection, decrease to the level of control individuals after spontaneous viral clearance and after treatment induced sustained virologic response (SVR).89,93 The mechanism of Treg upregulation occurring during HCV infection remains unclear; however, it has been proposed that HCV itself can induce Treg upregulation specifically by HCV core protein.93,94 Viral escape mutations are a major factor in the development of chronic HCV. HCV viral RNA is highly prone to mutations due to its RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and its lack of proofreading function. Multiple virus mutants can co-exist, eventually leading to the selection of CD8+ T cell escape variants. Up to 50–70% of patients with chronic HCV infections exhibit mutations at viral epitopes targeted by CD8+ T cells.95,96 Viral escape mutations emerge during the early acute infection and remain fixed in the quasispecies for years, implicating themselves as a mechanism for immune system evasion and chronic progression.97 However, many viral mutations have been shown to reduce fitness and viral replicative capacity.98,99 Thus, as a consequence of the viral mutant-impaired fitness, most viral escape mutations will revert to wild-type long term and be the primary transmission agent to a new host.100 Some HLA alleles have been shown to be protective of the viral escape mutants and are associated with a decrease in chronicity. HLA-B27 positivity is protective against chronic HCV progression; however, escape mutations can still occur. HLA-B27–binding anchor encodes a highly conserved region on viral RNA polymerase, where mutations at this epitope often lead to a non-functional RNA polymerase.101

IFN and DAA HCV therapy

IFN remains an important immunomodulator involved in host defense and treatment of chronic HCV. Upon viral entry into the host cell, HCV RNA is detected by TLR3 in the endosome and by RIG-I in the cytoplasm. Activation of these receptor pathways lead to interferon transcription. There are 3 major types of interferon, Type I and III IFN are produced by the infected hepatocyte and Type II IFN are produced by NK-cells and natural killer T cells (NKT cells). IFN bind to specific transmembrane JAK–STAT receptor signaling pathways to regulate gene transcription in the nucleus inducing an “antiviral state” in the cell activating both the innate and adaptive immune systems through various stimulatory pathways.102104

Historically, pegylated-IFN and ribavirin have been the mainstay of treatment of chronic HCV. Today, DAAs remain the preferred treatment choice; however, IFN-based therapies remain a treatment option. With IFN use, HCV genotypes play an important role in treatment strategy and outcome. HCV genotypes 1 and 4 require longer treatment (48 weeks) and achieve a SVR of 50%. Meanwhile, HCV genotypes 2 and 3 require a shorter treatment time, with a higher SVR around 80%.105107 The divergent response to IFN treatment has stimulated intense research, examining the mechanisms of non-response in an attempt to identify predictors of non-response that may guide therapy. The exact mechanism of IFN therapy failure remains unclear; however, it is thought that various viral mutations and host immune factors contribute to divergent responses to IFN. Various mechanisms of IFN treatment failure via inhibition of IFN signaling pathways have been shown.108110 Besides HCV genotypes, multiple host factors have also been shown to affect IFN treatment response, including host sex, age, and race. Male sex, older age and African-American race are associated with inferior response to IFN therapy.111

The development of non-IFN-based therapy with DAAs have resulted in a much better safety profile and shorter duration of therapy, with a dramatic increase in virus cure rates, especially in difficult to treat HCV genotypes. The use of HCV screening in high risk populations (i.e. intravenous drug users) and highly effective DAA treatments have also proven cost-effective in avoiding liver-related mortality and liver transplantations.112 There are three targets of DAA therapy, including NS3/4A protease inhibitors, NS5A polymerase inhibitors, NS5B polymerase inhibitors. DAA therapy is highly effective, with SVR rates >95% in genotype 1-infected patients without cirrhosis including those co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus, and about 78–87% effective in decompensated cirrhotics with Child–Turcotte–Pugh class C disease.113 Despite the high rate of DAA effectiveness in achieving SVR, the sheer magnitude of individuals infected with HCV leaves a significant cohort of patients who fail their initial therapy. Clinical trials of re-treatment after failure of initial DAA therapy have shown high rates of SVR with DAA salvage therapy. Re-treatment regimens utilize strategies such as adding additional active agents (other DAA classes and/or ribavirin), using longer treatment courses, or both. Clinical trials such as POLARIS-1, POLARIS-4, MAGELLAN-3 have shown a 90–98% effective re-treatment cure rate after initial DAA failure.114,115 The mechanism of DAA resistance is thought to be due to various mutations seen in the different HCV genotypes and the DAA interaction sites that render the drugs ineffective. After DAA initiation, wild-type DAA-susceptible HCV species are eliminated, selecting for resistant variants. Some studies have shown that some of the acquired mutations in resistant quasispecies may increase viral fitness, which may explain the rapid viral replication seen on treatment (known as breakthrough) or after treatment (known as relapse).116 Genotype-specific DAA treatment regimens and the emergence of drug-resistant variants remain a significant concern. Genotype-specific DAA resistance is associated with polymorphisms present in the various HCV genotypes, such as the NS5A resistance-associated substitutions present in genotype 1, that lead to the decreased efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir regimens, or genotype 3 variations within the NS5A region, leading to reduced sensitivity to NAs. The emergence of genotype-specific DAA resistance has led to an increase in demand for pangenotypic therapies that have a higher barrier to drug resistance (such as sofosbuvir/velpatasvir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir) for treatment of all HCV genotypes, especially in resource-limited areas when genotype testing is unavailable.

Conclusions

Understanding the immune response to acute HBV infection and the immune system’s dysregulation that results in chronic HBV infection are important in developing preventive and therapeutic strategies. Both adaptive and innate immune responses play major roles in the eradication of HBV infection with the dysregulation of T cell immune response associated with progression to chronic HBV infection. Persistence of viral DNA in the form of cccDNA or incorporated into the host’s genome, along with the failure of the immune system to clear these infected cells, contributes to the persistence of HBV infection. The implementation of a vaccination program worldwide has led to an overall decrease in incidence of HBV infection. IFN, with its poor rate of viral clearance and significant side effects, has fallen out of favor for therapy in hepatitis B. NAs are currently the treatment of choice and are aimed at suppressing viral replication by suppressing reverse transcriptase but are rarely curative. New strategies for targeting HBV production (RNA interference, HBsAg inhibitors, capsid inhibitors) and immune response (PD-1 inhibitors, therapeutic vaccines) are currently under investigation as possible curative treatments.

Unlike HBV infection, effective curative regimens using DAAs have been developed and successfully implemented for HCV; however, no effective vaccinations exist yet. It is the sheer magnitude of infected individuals and the cost of treatment that have proven to be significant barriers to disease elimination and persistence of HCV-related morbidity and mortality. It is the combination of HCV viral escape mutations along with host immune factors that are major contributors in the development of chronic HCV. Although the exact mechanism remains unclear, persistent viral infection results in chronic suppressor T cell activation, which leads to a loss of T cell response. Ongoing research to develop a safe and effective vaccine will help decrease incidence and spread of HCV.

Abbreviations

+ssRNA: 

positive sense single-stranded RNA

-ssRNA: 

negative sense single stranded RNA

AHB: 

acute hepatitis B

ALT: 

alanine aminotransferase

anti-HBc or HBcAb: 

hepatitis B core antibody

anti-HBs or HBsAb: 

hepatitis B surface antibody

cccDNA: 

covalently closed circular DNA

CHB: 

chronic hepatitis B

cLD: 

cytosolic lipid droplet

CLDN1: 

claudin 1

DAA: 

direct-acting antiviral

ESCRT: 

endosomal sorting complex required for transport

HBcAg: 

hepatitis B virus core antigen

HBeAb: 

hepatitis B virus e-antigen antibody

HBeAg: 

hepatitis B virus e-antigen

HBsAg: 

hepatitis B surface antigen

HBV: 

hepatitis B virus

HCC: 

hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV: 

hepatitis C virus

HLA: 

human leukocyte antigen

IFN: 

interferon

IFN-I: 

interferon 1

IFN-α: 

interferon-alpha

IFN-γ: 

interferon-gamma

IL: 

interleukin

LCMV: 

lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus

LDL: 

low density lipid

NAs: 

nucleos(t)ide analogues

NK: 

natural killer

NKT: 

natural killer T

NPC1L1: 

Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 cholesterol absorption receptor

NTCP: 

sodium taurocholate cotransport polypeptide

OCLN: 

occludin

PCR: 

polymerase chain reaction

pDC: 

plasmacytoid dendritic cell

rcDNA: 

relaxed circular DNA

SR-BI: 

scavenger receptor class B type I

ssRNA: 

single-stranded RNA

SVR: 

sustained virological response

TGF-β: 

transforming growth factor-beta

TLR3: 

Toll-like receptor 3

TNF-α: 

tumor necrosis factor alpha

Treg: 

regulatory T cell

VLDL: 

very low density lipid

Declarations

Funding

None to declare.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests related to this publication.

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design (CS), acquisition of data (CS), analysis and interpretation of data (CS), drafting of the manuscript (CS), critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (JWB), administrative, technical, or material support, study supervision (JWB).

References

  1. Ott JJ, Stevens GA, Groeger J, Wiersma ST. Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection: new estimates of age-specific HBsAg seroprevalence and endemicity. Vaccine 2012;30(12):2212-2219 View Article
  2. Goldstein ST, Zhou F, Hadler SC, Bell BP, Mast EE, Margolis HS. A mathematical model to estimate global hepatitis B disease burden and vaccination impact. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34(6):1329-1339 View Article
  3. Choo QL, Kuo G, Weiner AJ, Overby LR, Bradley DW, Houghton M. Isolation of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-borne non-A, non-B viral hepatitis genome. Science 1989;244(4902):359-362 View Article
  4. Kuo G, Choo QL, Alter HJ, Gitnick GL, Redeker AG, Purcell RH, et al. An assay for circulating antibodies to a major etiologic virus of human non-A, non-B hepatitis. Science 1989;244(4902):362-364 View Article
  5. World Health Organization. Web Annex B. WHO estimates of the prevalence and incidence of hepatitis C virus infection by WHO region, 2015. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/277005/WHO-CDS-HIV-18.46-eng.pdf
  6. Kamal SM. Acute hepatitis C: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103(5):1283-1297 View Article
  7. Rustgi VK. The epidemiology of hepatitis C infection in the United States. J Gastroenterol 2007;42(7):513-521 View Article
  8. Yamane D, McGivern DR, Masaki T, Lemon SM. Liver injury and disease pathogenesis in chronic hepatitis C. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2013;369:263-288 View Article
  9. Yan H, Zhong G, Xu G, He W, Jing Z, Gao Z, Huang Y, Qi Y, Peng B, et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. Elife 2012;1:e00049 View Article
  10. Li H, Zhuang Q, Wang Y, Zhang T, Zhao J, Zhang Y, et al. HBV life cycle is restricted in mouse hepatocytes expressing human NTCP. Cell Mol Immunol 2014;11(2):175-183 View Article
  11. Jaoudé GA, Sureau C. Role of the antigenic loop of the hepatitis B virus envelope proteins in infectivity of hepatitis delta virus. J Virol 2005;79(16):10460-10466 View Article
  12. Tuttleman JS, Pourcel C, Summers J. Formation of the pool of covalently closed circular viral DNA in hepadnavirus-infected cells. Cell 1986;47(3):451-460 View Article
  13. Wu TT, Coates L, Aldrich CE, Summers J, Mason WS. In hepatocytes infected with duck hepatitis B virus, the template for viral RNA synthesis is amplified by an intracellular pathway. Virology 1990;175(1):255-261 View Article
  14. Wieland S, Thimme R, Purcell RH, Chisari FV. Genomic analysis of the host response to hepatitis B virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004;101(17):6669-6674 View Article
  15. Baron JL, Gardiner L, Nishimura S, Shinkai K, Locksley R, Ganem D. Activation of a nonclassical NKT cell subset in a transgenic mouse model of hepatitis B virus infection. Immunity 2002;16(4):583-594 View Article
  16. Xia Y, Stadler D, Lucifora J, Reisinger F, Webb D, Hösel M, et al. Interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α produced by T cells reduce the HBV persistence form, cccDNA, without cytolysis. Gastroenterology 2016;150(1):194-205 View Article
  17. Gerlich WH. Medical virology of hepatitis B: how it began and where we are now. Virol J 2013;10:239 View Article
  18. Glebe D, Aliakbari M, Krass P, Knoop EV, Valerius KP, Gerlich WH. Pre-s1 antigen-dependent infection of Tupaia hepatocyte cultures with human hepatitis B virus. J Virol 2003;77(17):9511-9521 View Article
  19. Neurath AR, Seto B, Strick N. Antibodies to synthetic peptides from the preS1 region of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) envelope (env) protein are virus-neutralizing and protective. Vaccine 1989;7(3):234-236 View Article
  20. Thimme R, Wieland S, Steiger C, Ghrayeb J, Reimann KA, Purcell RH, et al. CD8(+) T cells mediate viral clearance and disease pathogenesis during acute hepatitis B virus infection. J Virol 2003;77(1):68-76 View Article
  21. Guidotti LG, Ishikawa T, Hobbs MV, Matzke B, Schreiber R, Chisari FV. Intracellular inactivation of the hepatitis B virus by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Immunity 1996;4(1):25-36 View Article
  22. Zhang Z, Zhang JY, Wherry EJ, Jin B, Xu B, Zou ZS, et al. Dynamic programmed death 1 expression by virus-specific CD8 T cells correlates with the outcome of acute hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2008;134(7):1938-1949, 1949.e1-3. Gastroenterology 2008;134(7):1938-1949 View Article
  23. Schurich A, Khanna P, Lopes AR, Han KJ, Peppa D, Micco L, et al. Role of the coinhibitory receptor cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 on apoptosis-Prone CD8 T cells in persistent hepatitis B virus infection. Hepatology 2011;53(5):1494-1503 View Article
  24. Fisicaro P, Valdatta C, Massari M, Loggi E, Biasini E, Sacchelli L, et al. Antiviral intrahepatic T-cell responses can be restored by blocking programmed death-1 pathway in chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2010;138(2):682-693, 693.e1-4. View Article
  25. Raziorrouh B, Schraut W, Gerlach T, Nowack D, Grüner NH, Ulsenheimer A, et al. The immunoregulatory role of CD244 in chronic hepatitis B infection and its inhibitory potential on virus-specific CD8+ T-cell function. Hepatology 2010;52(6):1934-1947 View Article
  26. Lau GK, Piratvisuth T, Luo KX, Marcellin P, Thongsawat S, Cooksley G, et al. Peginterferon Alfa-2a, lamivudine, and the combination for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2005;352(26):2682-2695 View Article
  27. Nan XP, Zhang Y, Yu HT, Sun RL, Peng MJ, Li Y, et al. Inhibition of viral replication downregulates CD4(+)CD25(high) regulatory T cells and programmed death-ligand 1 in chronic hepatitis B. Viral Immunol 2012;25(1):21-28 View Article
  28. Ferri C, Ramos-Casals M, Zignego AL, Arcaini L, Roccatello D, Antonelli A, et al. International diagnostic guidelines for patients with HCV-related extrahepatic manifestations. A multidisciplinary expert statement. Autoimmun Rev 2016;15(12):1145-1160 View Article
  29. Rasul I, Shepherd FA, Kamel-Reid S, Krajden M, Pantalony D, Heathcote EJ. Detection of occult low-grade b-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection and mixed cryoglobulinemia. Hepatology 1999;29(2):543-547 View Article
  30. Lunemann S, Malone DF, Hengst J, Port K, Grabowski J, Deterding K, et al. Compromised function of natural killer cells in acute and chronic viral hepatitis. J Infect Dis 2014;209(9):1362-1373 View Article
  31. Tan AT, Hoang LT, Chin D, Rasmussen E, Lopatin U, Hart S, et al. Reduction of HBV replication prolongs the early immunological response to IFNα therapy. J Hepatol 2014;60(1):54-61 View Article
  32. Gill US, Peppa D, Micco L, Singh HD, Carey I, Foster GR, et al. Interferon alpha induces sustained changes in NK cell responsiveness to hepatitis B viral load suppression in vivo. PLoS Pathog 2016;12(8):e1005788 View Article
  33. Wursthorn K, Lutgehetmann M, Dandri M, Volz T, Buggisch P, Zollner B, et al. Peginterferon alpha-2b plus adefovir induce strong cccDNA decline and HBsAg reduction in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2006;44(3):675-684 View Article
  34. Boni C, Laccabue D, Lampertico P, Giuberti T, Viganò M, Schivazappa S, et al. Restored function of HBV-specific T cells after long-term effective therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogues. Gastroenterology 2012;143(4):963-973.e9 View Article
  35. Boni C, Penna A, Ogg GS, Bertoletti A, Pilli M, Cavallo C, et al. Lamivudine treatment can overcome cytotoxic T-cell hyporesponsiveness in chronic hepatitis B: new perspectives for immune therapy. Hepatology 2001;33(4):963-971 View Article
  36. Gerety RJ, Ellis RW. Plasma-derived vs recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. JAMA 1987;258(11):1474 View Article
  37. Walayat S, Ahmed Z, Martin D, Puli S, Cashman M, Dhillon S. Recent advances in vaccination of non-responders to standard dose hepatitis B virus vaccine. World J Hepatol 2015;7(24):2503-2509 View Article
  38. Godkin A, Davenport M, Hill AV. Molecular analysis of HLA class II associations with hepatitis B virus clearance and vaccine nonresponsiveness. Hepatology 2005;41(6):1383-1390 View Article
  39. Egea E, Iglesias A, Salazar M, Morimoto C, Kruskall MS, Awdeh Z, et al. The cellular basis for lack of antibody response to hepatitis B vaccine in humans. J Exp Med 1991;173(3):531-538 View Article
  40. He C, Nomura F, Itoga S, Isobe K, Nakai T. Prevalence of vaccine-induced escape mutants of hepatitis B virus in the adult population in China: a prospective study in 176 restaurant employees. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001;16(12):1373-1377 View Article
  41. Purdy MA. Hepatitis B virus S gene escape mutants. Asian J Transfus Sci 2007;1(2):62-70 View Article
  42. Kohara M, Tanaka T, Tsukiyama-Kohara K, Tanaka S, Mizokami M, Lau JY, et al. Hepatitis C virus genotypes 1 and 2 respond to interferon-alpha with different virologic kinetics. J Infect Dis 1995;172(4):934-938 View Article
  43. Hadziyannis SJ, Sette H, Morgan TR, Balan V, Diago M, Marcellin P, et al. Peginterferon-alpha2a and ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: a randomized study of treatment duration and ribavirin dose. Ann Intern Med 2004;140(5):346-355 View Article
  44. Zeisel MB, Felmlee DJ, Baumert TF. Hepatitis C virus entry. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2013;369:87-112 View Article
  45. Hepatitis C guidance: AASLD-IDSA recommendations for testing, managing, and treating adults infected with hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 2015;62(3):932-954 View Article
  46. Kamal SM, Rasenack JW, Bianchi L, Al Tawil A, El Sayed Khalifa K, Peter T, et al. Acute hepatitis C without and with schistosomiasis: correlation with hepatitis C-specific CD4(+) T-cell and cytokine response. Gastroenterology 2001;121(3):646-656 View Article
  47. Maier I, Wu GY. Hepatitis C and HIV co-infection: a review. World J Gastroenterol 2002;8(4):577-579 View Article
  48. Fontaine H, Kahi S, Chazallon C, Bourgine M, Varaut A, Buffet C, et al. Anti-HBV DNA vaccination does not prevent relapse after discontinuation of analogues in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a randomised trial—ANRS HB02 VAC-ADN. Gut 2015;64(1):139-147 View Article
  49. Lok AS, Pan CQ, Han SH, Trinh HN, Fessel WJ, Rodell T, et al. Randomized phase II study of GS-4774 as a therapeutic vaccine in virally suppressed patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol 2016;65(3):509-516 View Article
  50. Gane E, Verdon DJ, Brooks AE, Gaggar A, Nguyen AH, Subramanian GM, et al. Anti-PD-1 blockade with nivolumab with and without therapeutic vaccination for virally suppressed chronic hepatitis B: A pilot study. J Hepatol 2019;71(5):900-907 View Article
  51. Féray C, López-Labrador FX. Is PD-1 blockade a potential therapy for HBV?. JHEP Rep 2019;1(3):142-144 View Article
  52. Altekruse SF, Henley SJ, Cucinelli JE, McGlynn KA. Changing hepatocellular carcinoma incidence and liver cancer mortality rates in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2014;109(4):542-553 View Article
  53. Gower E, Estes C, Blach S, Razavi-Shearer K, Razavi H. Global epidemiology and genotype distribution of the hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol 2014;61(1 Suppl):S45-S57 View Article
  54. Simmonds P, Becher P, Bukh J, Gould EA, Meyers G, Monath T, et al. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Flaviviridae. J Gen Virol 2017;98(1):2-3 View Article
  55. Murphy DG, Sablon E, Chamberland J, Fournier E, Dandavino R, Tremblay CL. Hepatitis C virus genotype 7, a new genotype originating from central Africa. J Clin Microbiol 2015;53(3):967-972 View Article
  56. Agnello V, Abel G, Elfahal M, Knight GB, Zhang QX. Hepatitis C virus and other flaviviridae viruses enter cells via low density lipoprotein receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96(22):12766-12771 View Article
  57. Zahid MN, Turek M, Xiao F, Thi VL, Guérin M, Fofana I, et al. The postbinding activity of scavenger receptor class B type I mediates initiation of hepatitis C virus infection and viral dissemination. Hepatology 2013;57(2):492-504 View Article
  58. Harris HJ, Davis C, Mullins JG, Hu K, Goodall M, Farquhar MJ, et al. Claudin association with CD81 defines hepatitis C virus entry. J Biol Chem 2010;285(27):21092-21102 View Article
  59. Sainz B, Barretto N, Martin DN, Hiraga N, Imamura M, Hussain S, et al. Identification of the Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 cholesterol absorption receptor as a new hepatitis C virus entry factor. Nat Med 2012;18(2):281-285 View Article
  60. Targett-Adams P, Boulant S, Douglas MW, McLauchlan J. Lipid metabolism and HCV infection. Viruses 2010;2(5):1195-1217 View Article
  61. Morozov VA, Lagaye S. Hepatitis C virus: Morphogenesis, infection and therapy. World J Hepatol 2018;10(2):186-212 View Article
  62. Powdrill MH, Tchesnokov EP, Kozak RA, Russell RS, Martin R, Svarovskaia ES, et al. Contribution of a mutational bias in hepatitis C virus replication to the genetic barrier in the development of drug resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108(51):20509-20513 View Article
  63. Ribeiro RM, Li H, Wang S, Stoddard MB, Learn GH, Korber BT, et al. Quantifying the diversification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) during primary infection: estimates of the in vivo mutation rate. PLoS Pathog 2012;8(8):e1002881 View Article
  64. Choi KH. . Viral molecular machines. New York, NY, USA.Springer Science; 2012
  65. Barba G, Harper F, Harada T, Kohara M, Goulinet S, Matsuura Y, et al. Hepatitis C virus core protein shows a cytoplasmic localization and associates to cellular lipid storage droplets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94(4):1200-1205 View Article
  66. Huang H, Sun F, Owen DM, Li W, Chen Y, Gale M, et al. Hepatitis C virus production by human hepatocytes dependent on assembly and secretion of very low-density lipoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104(14):5848-5853 View Article
  67. Corless L, Crump CM, Griffin SD, Harris M. Vps4 and the ESCRT-III complex are required for the release of infectious hepatitis C virus particles. J Gen Virol 2010;91(Pt ;2):362-372 View Article
  68. Chang KM. Immunopathogenesis of hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Liver Dis 2003;7(1):89-105 View Article
  69. Nellore A, Fishman JA. NK cells, innate immunity and hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52(3):369-377 View Article
  70. Chigbu DI, Loonawat R, Sehgal M, Patel D, Jain P. Hepatitis C virus infection: Host-virus interaction and mechanisms of viral persistence. Cells 2019;8(4):376 View Article
  71. Xu Y, Zhong J. Innate immunity against hepatitis C virus. Curr Opin Immunol 2016;42:98-104 View Article
  72. Wang SH, Huang CX, Ye L, Wang X, Song L, Wang YJ, et al. Natural killer cells suppress full cycle HCV infection of human hepatocytes. J Viral Hepat 2008;15(12):855-864 View Article
  73. Jo J, Aichele U, Kersting N, Klein R, Aichele P, Bisse E, et al. Analysis of CD8+ T-cell-mediated inhibition of hepatitis C virus replication using a novel immunological model. Gastroenterology 2009;136(4):1391-1401 View Article
  74. Gerlach JT, Diepolder HM, Jung MC, Gruener NH, Schraut WW, Zachoval R, et al. Recurrence of hepatitis C virus after loss of virus-specific CD4(+) T-cell response in acute hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 1999;117(4):933-941 View Article
  75. Nascimbeni M, Mizukoshi E, Bosmann M, Major ME, Mihalik K, Rice CM, et al. Kinetics of CD4+ and CD8+ memory T-cell responses during hepatitis C virus rechallenge of previously recovered chimpanzees. J Virol 2003;77(8):4781-4793 View Article
  76. Thimme R, Binder M, Bartenschlager R. Failure of innate and adaptive immune responses in controlling hepatitis C virus infection. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2012;36(3):663-683 View Article
  77. Wherry EJ, Blattman JN, Murali-Krishna K, van der Most R, Ahmed R. Viral persistence alters CD8 T-cell immunodominance and tissue distribution and results in distinct stages of functional impairment. J Virol 2003;77(8):4911-4927 View Article
  78. Francavilla V, Accapezzato D, De Salvo M, Rawson P, Cosimi O, Lipp M, et al. Subversion of effector CD8+ T cell differentiation in acute hepatitis C virus infection: exploring the immunological mechanisms. Eur J Immunol 2004;34(2):427-437 View Article
  79. Yao ZQ, Eisen-Vandervelde A, Waggoner SN, Cale EM, Hahn YS. Direct binding of hepatitis C virus core to gC1qR on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells leads to impaired activation of Lck and Akt. J Virol 2004;78(12):6409-6419 View Article
  80. Urbani S, Amadei B, Tola D, Massari M, Schivazappa S, Missale G, et al. PD-1 expression in acute hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with HCV-specific CD8 exhaustion. J Virol 2006;80(22):11398-11403 View Article
  81. Nakamoto N, Kaplan DE, Coleclough J, Li Y, Valiga ME, Kaminski M, et al. Functional restoration of HCV-specific CD8 T cells by PD-1 blockade is defined by PD-1 expression and compartmentalization. Gastroenterology 2008;134(7):1927-1937 View Article
  82. Nakamoto N, Cho H, Shaked A, Olthoff K, Valiga ME, Kaminski M, et al. Synergistic reversal of intrahepatic HCV-specific CD8 T cell exhaustion by combined PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade. PLoS Pathog 2009;5(2):e1000313 View Article
  83. Schulze zur Wiesch J, Lauer GM, Day CL, Kim AY, Ouchi K, Duncan JE, et al. Broad repertoire of the CD4+ Th cell response in spontaneously controlled hepatitis C virus infection includes dominant and highly promiscuous epitopes. J Immunol 2005;175(6):3603-3613 View Article
  84. Diepolder HM, Zachoval R, Hoffmann RM, Wierenga EA, Santantonio T, Jung MC, et al. Possible mechanism involving T-lymphocyte response to non-structural protein 3 in viral clearance in acute hepatitis C virus infection. Lancet 1995;346(8981):1006-1007 View Article
  85. Eckels DD, Wang H, Bian TH, Tabatabai N, Gill JC. Immunobiology of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection: the role of CD4 T cells in HCV infection. Immunol Rev 2000;174:90-97 View Article
  86. Wang JH, Layden TJ, Eckels DD. Modulation of the peripheral T-Cell response by CD4 mutants of hepatitis C virus: transition from a Th1 to a Th2 response. Hum Immunol 2003;64(7):662-673 View Article
  87. Eckels DD, Zhou H, Bian TH, Wang H. Identification of antigenic escape variants in an immunodominant epitope of hepatitis C virus. Int Immunol 1999;11(4):577-583 View Article
  88. Cabrera R, Tu Z, Xu Y, Firpi RJ, Rosen HR, Liu C, et al. An immunomodulatory role for CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T lymphocytes in hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 2004;40(5):1062-1071 View Article
  89. Boettler T, Spangenberg HC, Neumann-Haefelin C, Panther E, Urbani S, Ferrari C, et al. T cells with a CD4+CD25+ regulatory phenotype suppress in vitro proliferation of virus-specific CD8+ T cells during chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Virol 2005;79(12):7860-7867 View Article
  90. Ward SM, Fox BC, Brown PJ, Worthington J, Fox SB, Chapman RW, et al. Quantification and localisation of FOXP3+ T lymphocytes and relation to hepatic inflammation during chronic HCV infection. J Hepatol 2007;47(3):316-324 View Article
  91. Barrat FJ, Cua DJ, Boonstra A, Richards DF, Crain C, Savelkoul HF, et al. In vitro generation of interleukin 10-producing regulatory CD4(+) T cells is induced by immunosuppressive drugs and inhibited by T helper type 1 (Th1)- and Th2-inducing cytokines. J Exp Med 2002;195(5):603-616 View Article
  92. Cerwenka A, Swain SL. TGF-beta1: immunosuppressant and viability factor for T lymphocytes. Microbes Infect 1999;1(15):1291-1296 View Article
  93. Sugimoto K, Ikeda F, Stadanlick J, Nunes FA, Alter HJ, Chang KM. Suppression of HCV-specific T cells without differential hierarchy demonstrated ex vivo in persistent HCV infection. Hepatology 2003;38(6):1437-1448 View Article
  94. Zhai N, Chi X, Li T, Song H, Li H, Jin X, et al. Hepatitis C virus core protein triggers expansion and activation of CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells in chronic hepatitis C patients. Cell Mol Immunol 2015;12(6):743-749 View Article
  95. Cox AL, Mosbruger T, Mao Q, Liu Z, Wang XH, Yang HC, et al. Cellular immune selection with hepatitis C virus persistence in humans. J Exp Med 2005;201(11):1741-1752 View Article
  96. Neumann-Haefelin C, Timm J, Spangenberg HC, Wischniowski N, Nazarova N, Kersting N, et al. Virological and immunological determinants of intrahepatic virus-specific CD8+ T-cell failure in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 2008;47(6):1824-1836 View Article
  97. Erickson AL, Kimura Y, Igarashi S, Eichelberger J, Houghton M, Sidney J, et al. The outcome of hepatitis C virus infection is predicted by escape mutations in epitopes targeted by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Immunity 2001;15(6):883-895 View Article
  98. Dazert E, Neumann-Haefelin C, Bressanelli S, Fitzmaurice K, Kort J, Timm J, et al. Loss of viral fitness and cross-recognition by CD8+ T cells limit HCV escape from a protective HLA-B27-restricted human immune response. J Clin Invest 2009;119(2):376-386 View Article
  99. Salloum S, Oniangue-Ndza C, Neumann-Haefelin C, Hudson L, Giugliano S, aus dem Siepen M, et al. Escape from HLA-B*08-restricted CD8 T cells by hepatitis C virus is associated with fitness costs. J Virol 2008;82(23):11803-11812 View Article
  100. Timm J, Lauer GM, Kavanagh DG, Sheridan I, Kim AY, Lucas M, et al. CD8 epitope escape and reversion in acute HCV infection. J Exp Med 2004;200(12):1593-1604 View Article
  101. Neumann-Haefelin C, Oniangue-Ndza C, Kuntzen T, Schmidt J, Nitschke K, Sidney J, et al. Human leukocyte antigen B27 selects for rare escape mutations that significantly impair hepatitis C virus replication and require compensatory mutations. Hepatology 2011;54(4):1157-1166 View Article
  102. Thimme R, Oldach D, Chang KM, Steiger C, Ray SC, Chisari FV. Determinants of viral clearance and persistence during acute hepatitis C virus infection. J Exp Med 2001;194(10):1395-1406 View Article
  103. Marcello T, Grakoui A, Barba-Spaeth G, Machlin ES, Kotenko SV, MacDonald MR, et al. Interferons alpha and lambda inhibit hepatitis C virus replication with distinct signal transduction and gene regulation kinetics. Gastroenterology 2006;131(6):1887-1898 View Article
  104. Darnell JE, Kerr IM, Stark GR. Jak-STAT pathways and transcriptional activation in response to IFNs and other extracellular signaling proteins. Science 1994;264(5164):1415-1421 View Article
  105. Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, Smith C, Marinos G, Gonçales FL, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347(13):975-982 View Article
  106. Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi VK, Shiffman M, Reindollar R, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001;358(9286):958-965 View Article
  107. Kamal SM, El Tawil AA, Nakano T, He Q, Rasenack J, Hakam SA, et al. Peginterferon {alpha}-2b and ribavirin therapy in chronic hepatitis C genotype 4: impact of treatment duration and viral kinetics on sustained virological response. Gut 2005;54(6):858-866 View Article
  108. Meylan E, Curran J, Hofmann K, Moradpour D, Binder M, Bartenschlager R, et al. Cardif is an adaptor protein in the RIG-I antiviral pathway and is targeted by hepatitis C virus. Nature 2005;437(7062):1167-1172 View Article
  109. Garaigorta U, Chisari FV. Hepatitis C virus blocks interferon effector function by inducing protein kinase R phosphorylation. Cell Host Microbe 2009;6(6):513-522 View Article
  110. Heim MH, Moradpour D, Blum HE. Expression of hepatitis C virus proteins inhibits signal transduction through the Jak-STAT pathway. J Virol 1999;73(10):8469-8475 View Article
  111. Conjeevaram HS, Fried MW, Jeffers LJ, Terrault NA, Wiley-Lucas TE, Afdhal N, et al. Peginterferon and ribavirin treatment in African American and Caucasian American patients with hepatitis C genotype 1. Gastroenterology 2006;131(2):470-477 View Article
  112. Tatar M, Keeshin SW, Mailliard M, Wilson FA. Cost-effectiveness of universal and targeted hepatitis C virus screening in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3(9):e2015756 View Article
  113. Pawlotsky JM. New hepatitis C therapies: the toolbox, strategies, and challenges. Gastroenterology 2014;146(5):1176-1192 View Article
  114. Bourlière M, Gordon SC, Flamm SL, Cooper CL, Ramji A, Tong M, et al. Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir, and voxilaprevir for previously treated HCV infection. N Engl J Med 2017;376(22):2134-2146 View Article
  115. Wyles D, Weiland O, Yao B, Weilert F, Dufour JF, Gordon SC, et al. Retreatment of patients who failed glecaprevir/pibrentasvir treatment for hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol 2019;70(5):1019-1023 View Article
  116. Seeff LB. Natural history of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002;36(5 Suppl 1):S35-S46 View Article
  117. Shi ST, Polyak SJ, Tu H, Taylor DR, Gretch DR, Lai MM. Hepatitis C virus NS5A colocalizes with the core protein on lipid droplets and interacts with apolipoproteins. Virology 2002;292(2):198-210 View Article
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology
  • pISSN 2225-0719
  • eISSN 2310-8819

A Review of Hepatitis B Virus and Hepatitis C Virus Immunopathogenesis

Corey Saraceni, John Birk
  • Reset Zoom
  • Download TIFF